linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 12/22] arm64: dts: mt8192: Add mmc device nodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <90324c6f-e3ef-5b18-8779-8a11ca67039b@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 Mar 2022 18:53:52 +0100
From:   Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
To:     Allen-KH Cheng <allen-kh.cheng@...iatek.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
Cc:     Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>,
        Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@...nel.org>,
        Hui Liu <hui.liu@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 12/22] arm64: dts: mt8192: Add mmc device nodes



On 18/03/2022 15:45, Allen-KH Cheng wrote:
> Add mmc nodes for mt8192 SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Allen-KH Cheng <allen-kh.cheng@...iatek.com>
> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++---
>   1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi
> index 6220d6962f58..2648f2847993 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi
> @@ -1150,10 +1150,36 @@
>   			#clock-cells = <1>;
>   		};
>   
> -		msdc: clock-controller@...60000 {
> -			compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-msdc";
> -			reg = <0 0x11f60000 0 0x1000>;
> -			#clock-cells = <1>;

We don't need the msdc_axi_wrap clock and that's why we delete the node, 
correct? In that case we could only disable the node, as DTS should describe the 
HW as it is. Please also add a line in the commit message explaining that.

Regards,
Matthias

> +		mmc0: mmc@...60000 {
> +			compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-mmc", "mediatek,mt8183-mmc";
> +			reg = <0 0x11f60000 0 0x1000>, <0 0x11f50000 0 0x1000>;
> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 99 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
> +			clocks = <&topckgen CLK_TOP_MSDC50_0_SEL>,
> +				 <&msdc_top CLK_MSDC_TOP_H_MST_0P>,
> +				 <&msdc_top CLK_MSDC_TOP_SRC_0P>,
> +				 <&msdc_top CLK_MSDC_TOP_P_CFG>,
> +				 <&msdc_top CLK_MSDC_TOP_P_MSDC0>,
> +				 <&msdc_top CLK_MSDC_TOP_AXI>,
> +				 <&msdc_top CLK_MSDC_TOP_AHB2AXI_BRG_AXI>;
> +			clock-names = "source", "hclk", "source_cg", "sys_cg",
> +				      "pclk_cg", "axi_cg", "ahb_cg";
> +			status = "disabled";
> +		};
> +
> +		mmc1: mmc@...70000 {
> +			compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-mmc", "mediatek,mt8183-mmc";
> +			reg = <0 0x11f70000 0 0x1000>, <0 0x11c70000 0 0x1000>;
> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 103 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
> +			clocks = <&topckgen CLK_TOP_MSDC30_1_SEL>,
> +				 <&msdc_top CLK_MSDC_TOP_H_MST_1P>,
> +				 <&msdc_top CLK_MSDC_TOP_SRC_1P>,
> +				 <&msdc_top CLK_MSDC_TOP_P_CFG>,
> +				 <&msdc_top CLK_MSDC_TOP_P_MSDC1>,
> +				 <&msdc_top CLK_MSDC_TOP_AXI>,
> +				 <&msdc_top CLK_MSDC_TOP_AHB2AXI_BRG_AXI>;
> +			clock-names = "source", "hclk", "source_cg", "sys_cg",
> +				      "pclk_cg", "axi_cg", "ahb_cg";
> +			status = "disabled";
>   		};
>   
>   		mfgcfg: clock-controller@...bf000 {