[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220325181850.513023-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 11:18:50 -0700
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: remove unnecessary f2fs_lock_op in f2fs_new_inode
This can be removed, since f2fs_alloc_nid() actually doesn't require to block
checkpoint and __f2fs_build_free_nids() is covered by nm_i->nat_tree_lock.
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
---
fs/f2fs/namei.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/namei.c b/fs/f2fs/namei.c
index 5ed79b29999f..816285414564 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/namei.c
@@ -37,13 +37,10 @@ static struct inode *f2fs_new_inode(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns,
if (!inode)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
- f2fs_lock_op(sbi);
if (!f2fs_alloc_nid(sbi, &ino)) {
- f2fs_unlock_op(sbi);
err = -ENOSPC;
goto fail;
}
- f2fs_unlock_op(sbi);
nid_free = true;
--
2.35.1.1021.g381101b075-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists