linux-kernel - Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: remove unnecessary f2fs_lock_op in f2fs_new

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c1101316-fd59-812c-aa4a-a0fa2d2004eb@kernel.org>
Date:   Sat, 26 Mar 2022 16:41:10 +0800
From:   Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
To:     Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: remove unnecessary f2fs_lock_op in
 f2fs_new_inode

On 2022/3/26 2:18, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> This can be removed, since f2fs_alloc_nid() actually doesn't require to block
> checkpoint and __f2fs_build_free_nids() is covered by nm_i->nat_tree_lock.
> 
> Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>

Looks fine, but still it needs more test to check stability w/ the patch. ;)

Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>

Thanks,