[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3415996d-e8b5-2416-fb66-e65779a9b507@omp.ru>
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2022 11:41:31 +0300
From: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Fabien Dessenne <fabien.dessenne@...s.st.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
<linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>
CC: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
"Martin Blumenstingl" <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/5] pinctrl: armada-37xx: Replace custom code by
gpiochip_count() call
Hello!
On 3/25/22 11:03 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Since we have generic function to count GPIO controller nodes
> under given device, there is no need to open code it. Replace
> custom code by gpiochip_count() call.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-armada-37xx.c | 24 +++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-armada-37xx.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-armada-37xx.c
> index 08cad14042e2..ba94125f6566 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-armada-37xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-armada-37xx.c
> @@ -728,22 +728,18 @@ static int armada_37xx_irqchip_register(struct platform_device *pdev,
> struct gpio_irq_chip *girq = &gc->irq;
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> struct device_node *np;
> - int ret = -ENODEV, i, nr_irq_parent;
> + unsigned int nr_child_nodes, i;
> + int ret;
>
> /* Check if we have at least one gpio-controller child node */
> - for_each_child_of_node(dev->of_node, np) {
> - if (of_property_read_bool(np, "gpio-controller")) {
> - ret = 0;
> - break;
> - }
> - }
> - if (ret)
> - return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "no gpio-controller child node\n");
> + nr_child_nodes = gpiochip_count(dev);
> + if (!nr_child_nodes)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENODEV, "no gpio-controller child node\n");
>
> - nr_irq_parent = of_irq_count(np);
> spin_lock_init(&info->irq_lock);
>
> - if (!nr_irq_parent) {
> + nr_child_nodes = of_irq_count(np);
Mhm, 'np' is no longer assigned to at this point...
> + if (!nr_child_nodes) {
> dev_err(dev, "invalid or no IRQ\n");
> return 0;
> }
[...]
MBR, Sergey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists