lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 25 Mar 2022 12:43:35 -0500
From:   Guillaume Ranquet <granquet@...libre.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com, chunkuang.hu@...nel.org,
        p.zabel@...gutronix.de, airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com,
        mripard@...nel.org, tzimmermann@...e.de, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
        chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com, kishon@...com, vkoul@...nel.org,
        deller@....de, ck.hu@...iatek.com, jitao.shi@...iatek.com
Cc:     dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
        markyacoub@...gle.com,
        Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@...libre.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/22] dt-bindings: mediatek,dpi: Add DP_INTF compatible

On Fri, 25 Mar 2022 18:31, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
>On 25/03/2022 18:14, Guillaume Ranquet wrote:
>> From: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@...libre.com>
>>
>> DP_INTF is similar to DPI but does not have the exact same feature set
>> or register layouts.
>>
>> DP_INTF is the sink of the display pipeline that is connected to the
>> DisplayPort controller and encoder unit. It takes the same clocks as
>> DPI.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@...libre.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Guillaume Ranquet <granquet@...libre.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>
>This is v1, how did you get Rob's review already?
>

Because this is not v1... I'm not really good at this... this is actually v9...
I just didn't pay attention enough before sending the series.

What's the standard thing to do? resend with the proper versionning?

Sorry for the confusion,
Guillaume.

>> ---
>>  .../bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.yaml       | 11 ++++++-----
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.yaml
>> index dd2896a40ff0..53acf9a84f7f 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.yaml
>> @@ -4,16 +4,16 @@
>>  $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.yaml#
>>  $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>
>> -title: mediatek DPI Controller Device Tree Bindings
>> +title: mediatek DPI/DP_INTF Controller Device Tree Bindings
>
>While at it, remove "Device Tree Bindings". It's about hardware.
>
>
>Please also rebase your tree as you use my old email address.
>
>Best regards,
>Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ