[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874k3lg7r3.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 13:19:28 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] scripts/get_feat.pl: allow output the parsed
file names
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org> writes:
> Such output could be helpful while debugging it, but its main
> goal is to tell kernel_feat.py about what files were used
> by the script. Thie way, kernel_feat.py can add those as
> documentation dependencies.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
So I think these are worth getting into 5.18, but I do have one question:
> @@ -95,6 +97,10 @@ sub parse_feat {
> return if ($file =~ m,($prefix)/arch-support.txt,);
> return if (!($file =~ m,arch-support.txt$,));
>
> + if ($enable_fname) {
> + printf "#define FILE %s\n", abs_path($file);
> + }
> +
Why do you output the file names in this format? This isn't input to
the C preprocessor, so the #define just seems strange. What am I
missing here?
Thanks,
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists