[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220326002109.2cda0402@coco.lan>
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2022 00:21:09 +0100
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] scripts/get_feat.pl: allow output the parsed
file names
Em Fri, 25 Mar 2022 13:19:28 -0600
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> escreveu:
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org> writes:
>
> > Such output could be helpful while debugging it, but its main
> > goal is to tell kernel_feat.py about what files were used
> > by the script. Thie way, kernel_feat.py can add those as
> > documentation dependencies.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
>
> So I think these are worth getting into 5.18,
Yeah, agreed.
> but I do have one question:
>
> > @@ -95,6 +97,10 @@ sub parse_feat {
> > return if ($file =~ m,($prefix)/arch-support.txt,);
> > return if (!($file =~ m,arch-support.txt$,));
> >
> > + if ($enable_fname) {
> > + printf "#define FILE %s\n", abs_path($file);
> > + }
> > +
>
> Why do you output the file names in this format? This isn't input to
> the C preprocessor, so the #define just seems strange. What am I
> missing here?
Well, I didn't think much about that... I just ended using a way that is
already used on get_abi.pl, and was originally imported from kernel-doc :-)
It could be using whatever other tag, but I would keep those three scripts
using a similar markup string for file names and line numbers:
scripts/get_abi.pl:
printf "#define LINENO %s%s#%s\n\n", $prefix, $file[0], $data{$what}->{line_no};
scripts/kernel-doc:
print "#define LINENO " . $lineno . "\n";
Thanks,
Mauro
Powered by blists - more mailing lists