[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yj3T6Is9kJYLrPiC@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 16:38:32 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Clément Léger <clement.leger@...tlin.com>
Cc: Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Allan Nielsen <allan.nielsen@...rochip.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/9] i2c: mux: pinctrl: remove CONFIG_OF dependency
and use fwnode API
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 12:31:47PM +0100, Clément Léger wrote:
> In order to use i2c muxes with all types of nodes, switch to fwnode
> API. The fwnode layer will allow to use this with both device_node and
> software_node.
>
> This commits is simply replacing the use of "of_" prefixed functions
> with there fwnode equivalent.
What I meant by splitting to the patches is to be able to have first patch of
a such split to be independent of this series. And I believe one or two (if
you split to more logical pieces) may be done this way, means we have already
available APIs.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists