[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQLg0h7aJBPSfmQdL_M=S9QHWe+xLXZPL4gzMYejz=Mf0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 09:49:47 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] kprobes: rethook: x86: Replace kretprobe
trampoline with rethook
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 7:43 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 11:22:53PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>
> > Masami Hiramatsu (3):
> > kprobes: Use rethook for kretprobe if possible
> > rethook: kprobes: x86: Replace kretprobe with rethook on x86
> > x86,kprobes: Fix optprobe trampoline to generate complete pt_regs
> >
> > Peter Zijlstra (1):
> > Subject: x86,rethook: Fix arch_rethook_trampoline() to generate a complete pt_regs
>
> You fat-fingered the subject there ^
>
> Other than that:
>
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
>
> Hopefully the ftrace return trampoline can also be switched over..
Thanks Peter. What's an ETA on landing endbr set?
Did I miss a pull req?
I see an odd error in linux-next with bpf selftests
which may or may not be related. Planning to debug it
when everything settles in Linus's tree.
Masami, could you do another respin?
Also do you mind squashing patches 2,3,4 ?
It's odd to have the same lines of code patched up 3 times.
Just do it right once.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists