[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yj3VAsgGA9zJvxgs@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 15:43:14 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] kprobes: rethook: x86: Replace kretprobe
trampoline with rethook
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 11:22:53PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Masami Hiramatsu (3):
> kprobes: Use rethook for kretprobe if possible
> rethook: kprobes: x86: Replace kretprobe with rethook on x86
> x86,kprobes: Fix optprobe trampoline to generate complete pt_regs
>
> Peter Zijlstra (1):
> Subject: x86,rethook: Fix arch_rethook_trampoline() to generate a complete pt_regs
You fat-fingered the subject there ^
Other than that:
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Hopefully the ftrace return trampoline can also be switched over..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists