[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YkHhF7dF9SYS2qTx@robh.at.kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 11:23:51 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: PCI: uniphier: Convert uniphier-pcie.txt to
json-schema
On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 07:51:05AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Mar 2022 11:11:38 +0900, Kunihiko Hayashi wrote:
> > Convert the file into a JSON description at the yaml format.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>
> > ---
> > .../bindings/pci/socionext,uniphier-pcie.yaml | 100 ++++++++++++++++++
> > .../devicetree/bindings/pci/uniphier-pcie.txt | 82 --------------
> > MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
> > 3 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/socionext,uniphier-pcie.yaml
> > delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/uniphier-pcie.txt
> >
>
> Running 'make dtbs_check' with the schema in this patch gives the
> following warnings. Consider if they are expected or the schema is
> incorrect. These may not be new warnings.
>
> Note that it is not yet a requirement to have 0 warnings for dtbs_check.
> This will change in the future.
>
> Full log is available here: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1609988
>
>
> pcie@...00000: compatible: ['socionext,uniphier-pcie', 'snps,dw-pcie'] is too long
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/socionext/uniphier-ld20-akebi96.dt.yaml
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/socionext/uniphier-ld20-global.dt.yaml
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/socionext/uniphier-ld20-ref.dt.yaml
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/socionext/uniphier-pxs3-ref.dt.yaml
Ignore this if your intent is to fix these by dropping 'snps,dw-pcie'. I
think that is the right thing to do. 'snps,dw-pcie' is not too
meaningful.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists