[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YkHsNtF8oGqE0g2i@matsya>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 22:41:18 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: rename interconnect nodes
On 28-03-22, 17:07, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 28/03/2022 16:30, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > clk-virt and mc-virt interconnect nodes were named interconnect@0 and
> > interconnect@1. That is incorrect as we don't have unit addresses 0/1
> > for these node.
> >
> > This causes warning:
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi:255.27-259.4:
> > Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /interconnect@0:
> > node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi:261.26-265.4:
> > Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /interconnect@1:
> > node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi:255.27-259.4:
> > Warning (unique_unit_address_if_enabled): /interconnect@0:
> > duplicate unit-address (also used in node /soc@0)
> >
> > Rename the nodes to interconnect-0 and interconnect-1 to fix the
> > warning.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
> > Suggested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> The DT schema will still need to be fixed because it expects 'reg' address.
Yes will update that as well..
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Thanks
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists