linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/6] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250: move sound node out of soc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 28 Mar 2022 22:44:13 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250: move sound node out of soc

On 28-03-22, 17:14, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 28/03/2022 16:30, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > The soc node expects all the nodes to have unit addresses. The sound
> > node does not have that which causes warnings:
> > 
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250.dtsi:2806.16-2807.5:
> > Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc@...ound: missing or empty reg/ranges property
> > 
> > Move sound node out of soc to fix this
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250.dtsi | 6 +++---
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> 
> I don't know the SM8250, but usually the sound node (e.g. containing
> audio-codec) is not part of SoC. I propose to remove it entirely from
> DTSI and define in same place in each DTS. It makes more sense logically
> in such case - one clearly see which board defines the sounds, which
> does not.

Most of our boards have sound, should we duplicate it in all the
boards..? Bjorn..?

-- 
~Vinod