lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 22:44:13 +0530 From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org> To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250: move sound node out of soc On 28-03-22, 17:14, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 28/03/2022 16:30, Vinod Koul wrote: > > The soc node expects all the nodes to have unit addresses. The sound > > node does not have that which causes warnings: > > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250.dtsi:2806.16-2807.5: > > Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc@...ound: missing or empty reg/ranges property > > > > Move sound node out of soc to fix this > > > > Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org> > > --- > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250.dtsi | 6 +++--- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > I don't know the SM8250, but usually the sound node (e.g. containing > audio-codec) is not part of SoC. I propose to remove it entirely from > DTSI and define in same place in each DTS. It makes more sense logically > in such case - one clearly see which board defines the sounds, which > does not. Most of our boards have sound, should we duplicate it in all the boards..? Bjorn..? -- ~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists