[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2581031.1648470339@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 13:25:39 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: kushagra765@...look.com
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, corbet@....net,
maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, mripard@...nel.org,
tzimmermann@...e.de, airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch,
balbi@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, arnd@...db.de,
mcgrof@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-cachefs@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [ PATCH ] Documentation: fixed doc-build warnings
kushagra765@...look.com wrote:
> @@ -256,7 +256,6 @@ struct fscache_cookie *fscache_acquire_cookie(struct fscache_volume *volume,
>
> /**
> * fscache_use_cookie - Request usage of cookie attached to an object
> - * @object: Object description
> * @will_modify: If cache is expected to be modified locally
> *
> * Request usage of the cookie attached to an object. The caller should tell
> @@ -272,7 +271,6 @@ static inline void fscache_use_cookie(struct fscache_cookie *cookie,
>
> /**
> * fscache_unuse_cookie - Cease usage of cookie attached to an object
> - * @object: Object description
> * @aux_data: Updated auxiliary data (or NULL)
> * @object_size: Revised size of the object (or NULL)
> *
Just deleting these lines is the wrong thing to do. They should instead
mention the cookie parameter.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists