lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 28 Mar 2022 14:26:59 +0200
From:   Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
To:     Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@...iatek.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
        Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@...iatek.com>
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com,
        ryder.lee@...nel.org, wenst@...omium.org,
        chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com, Seiya Wang <seiya.wang@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 3/3] arm64: dts: Add mediatek SoC mt8195 and
 evaluation board



On 16/02/2022 12:31, Tinghan Shen wrote:
> Add basic chip support for mediatek mt8195.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Seiya Wang <seiya.wang@...iatek.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@...iatek.com>
> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/Makefile       |    1 +
>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-evb.dts |  161 +++
>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi    | 1049 +++++++++++++++++++
>   3 files changed, 1211 insertions(+)
>   create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-evb.dts
>   create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/Makefile
> index 8c1e18032f9f..5da29e7223e4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/Makefile
> @@ -38,4 +38,5 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MEDIATEK) += mt8183-kukui-krane-sku0.dtb
>   dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MEDIATEK) += mt8183-kukui-krane-sku176.dtb
>   dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MEDIATEK) += mt8183-pumpkin.dtb
>   dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MEDIATEK) += mt8192-evb.dtb
> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MEDIATEK) += mt8195-evb.dtb
>   dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MEDIATEK) += mt8516-pumpkin.dtb
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-evb.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-evb.dts
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..51633d91d984
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-evb.dts
> @@ -0,0 +1,161 @@
[...]
> +
> +&u2port0 {
> +	status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&u2port1 {
> +	status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&u3phy0 {
> +	status="okay";
> +};
> +
> +&u3phy1 {
> +	status="okay";
> +};
> +

So we enable phys for xhci but not the device. Are we missing anything to enable 
them on the EVB?

> +&uart0 {
> +	pinctrl-names = "default";
> +	pinctrl-0 = <&uart0_pin>;
> +	status = "okay";
> +};
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..a363e82f6988
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1,1049 @@
[...]
> +
> +	clk32k: oscillator-32k {
> +		compatible = "fixed-clock";
> +		#clock-cells = <0>;
> +		clock-frequency = <32768>;
> +		clock-output-names = "clk32k";

I suppose the 32KHz oscillator is really present on the board also not used by 
any device (up to now?).

[...]
> +
> +	soc {
> +		#address-cells = <2>;
> +		#size-cells = <2>;
> +		compatible = "simple-bus";
> +		ranges;
> +
[...]
> +
> +		pwrap: pwrap@...24000 {
> +			compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-pwrap", "syscon";
> +			reg = <0 0x10024000 0 0x1000>;
> +			reg-names = "pwrap";
> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 243 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
> +			clocks = <&infracfg_ao CLK_INFRA_AO_PMIC_AP>,
> +				 <&infracfg_ao CLK_INFRA_AO_PMIC_TMR>;
> +			clock-names = "spi", "wrap";

Binding mandates resets but not present here. It also mandates two register 
regions, but only one is given here.

> +			assigned-clocks = <&topckgen CLK_TOP_PWRAP_ULPOSC>;
> +			assigned-clock-parents = <&topckgen CLK_TOP_ULPOSC1_D10>;
> +		};
> +
> +		scp_adsp: clock-controller@...20000 {
> +			compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-scp_adsp";
> +			reg = <0 0x10720000 0 0x1000>;
> +			#clock-cells = <1>;
> +		};
> +

[...]

> +
> +		mmc0: mmc@...30000 {
> +			compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-mmc",
> +				     "mediatek,mt8183-mmc";
> +			reg = <0 0x11230000 0 0x10000>,
> +			      <0 0x11f50000 0 0x1000>;

Seems to be an oversight when adding support for mt8183-mmc support to the 
driver. The binding description is missing the optional host top register base. 
Chaotian can you please help to fix this in the binding description.

> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 131 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
> +			clocks = <&topckgen CLK_TOP_MSDC50_0>,
> +				 <&infracfg_ao CLK_INFRA_AO_MSDC0>,
> +				 <&infracfg_ao CLK_INFRA_AO_MSDC0_SRC>;
> +			clock-names = "source", "hclk", "source_cg";
> +			status = "disabled";
> +		};
> +
[...]
> +
> +		xhci3: usb@...b0000 {
> +			compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-xhci",
> +				     "mediatek,mtk-xhci";
> +			reg = <0 0x112b0000 0 0x1000>,
> +			      <0 0x112b3e00 0 0x0100>;
> +			reg-names = "mac", "ippc";
> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 536 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
> +			phys = <&u2port3 PHY_TYPE_USB2>;
> +			assigned-clocks = <&topckgen CLK_TOP_USB_TOP_3P>,
> +					  <&topckgen CLK_TOP_SSUSB_XHCI_3P>;
> +			assigned-clock-parents = <&topckgen CLK_TOP_UNIVPLL_D5_D4>,
> +						 <&topckgen CLK_TOP_UNIVPLL_D5_D4>;
> +			clocks = <&pericfg_ao CLK_PERI_AO_SSUSB_3P_BUS>,
> +				 <&topckgen CLK_TOP_SSUSB_P3_REF>,
> +				 <&pericfg_ao CLK_PERI_AO_SSUSB_3P_XHCI>;
> +			clock-names = "sys_ck", "ref_ck", "xhci_ck";
> +			/* This controller is connected with a BT device.
> +			 * Disable usb2 lpm to prevent konwn issues.
> +			 */
> +			usb2-lpm-disable;

My understanding is, that this depends on the board and not the SoC. Which means 
usb2-lpm-disable should go into any board that has a BT device connected to the 
xhci device (I don't see any active xhci node in mt8195-evb so far).

Regards,
Matthias

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ