[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6e118704-3c63-929e-ebf0-9a78fbed5daa@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 19:50:59 +0000
From: Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC: "andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
"ulf.hansson@...aro.org" <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com" <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
"gregory.clement@...tlin.com" <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
"huziji@...vell.com" <huziji@...vell.com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] dt-bindings: mmc: xenon: Convert to JSON schema
On 30/03/22 02:14, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 29/03/2022 13:50, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 13:02:31 +1300, Chris Packham wrote:
>>> Convert the marvell,xenon-sdhci binding to JSON schema. Currently the
>>> in-tree dts files don't validate because they use sdhci@ instead of mmc@
>>> as required by the generic mmc-controller schema.
>>>
>>> The compatible "marvell,sdhci-xenon" was not documented in the old
>>> binding but it accompanies the of "marvell,armada-3700-sdhci" in the
>>> armada-37xx SoC dtsi so this combination is added to the new binding
>>> document.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Notes:
>>> Changes in v4:
>>> - Add review from Krzysztof
>>> - Squash in addition of marvell,sdhci-xenon with an explanation in the
>>> commit message
>>> Changes in v3:
>>> - Don't accept ap807 without ap806
>>> - Add ref: string for pad-type
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> - Update MAINTAINERS entry
>>> - Incorporate feedback from Krzysztof
>>>
>>> .../bindings/mmc/marvell,xenon-sdhci.txt | 173 -----------
>>> .../bindings/mmc/marvell,xenon-sdhci.yaml | 275 ++++++++++++++++++
>>> MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
>>> 3 files changed, 276 insertions(+), 174 deletions(-)
>>> delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/marvell,xenon-sdhci.txt
>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/marvell,xenon-sdhci.yaml
>>>
>> My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
>> on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
>>
>> yamllint warnings/errors:
>>
>> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
>> /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/marvell,xenon-sdhci.example.dt.yaml: mmc@...000: compatible: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed:
>> ['marvell,armada-3700-sdhci'] is too short
>> 'marvell,armada-3700-sdhci' is not one of ['marvell,armada-cp110-sdhci', 'marvell,armada-ap806-sdhci']
>> 'marvell,armada-ap807-sdhci' was expected
>> From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/marvell,xenon-sdhci.yaml
>> /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/marvell,xenon-sdhci.example.dt.yaml: mmc@...000: compatible: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed:
>> ['marvell,armada-3700-sdhci'] is too short
>> 'marvell,armada-3700-sdhci' is not one of ['marvell,armada-cp110-sdhci', 'marvell,armada-ap806-sdhci']
>> 'marvell,armada-ap807-sdhci' was expected
>> From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/marvell,xenon-sdhci.yaml
>>
>> doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):
> Chris, your own dt binding does not pass it's check (example)...
>
> After updating the compatibles, you need to check the example. The
> examples are anyway duplicating common stuff, so half of them could be
> removed.
Yeah silly me. I started taking short cuts to run dt_binding_check
dtbs_check as one command but then the dt_bindings_check output scrolled
off the top of my terminal.
As for the examples themselves I want to leave what's there as a fairly
direct translation of the old binding. If we consider them unnecessary
removing them can be done as a follow-up.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists