[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YkRr22lQHKCZa5A2@robh.at.kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 09:40:27 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
"andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
"ulf.hansson@...aro.org" <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com" <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
"gregory.clement@...tlin.com" <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
"huziji@...vell.com" <huziji@...vell.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] dt-bindings: mmc: xenon: Convert to JSON schema
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 07:50:59PM +0000, Chris Packham wrote:
>
> On 30/03/22 02:14, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 29/03/2022 13:50, Rob Herring wrote:
> >> On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 13:02:31 +1300, Chris Packham wrote:
> >>> Convert the marvell,xenon-sdhci binding to JSON schema. Currently the
> >>> in-tree dts files don't validate because they use sdhci@ instead of mmc@
> >>> as required by the generic mmc-controller schema.
> >>>
> >>> The compatible "marvell,sdhci-xenon" was not documented in the old
> >>> binding but it accompanies the of "marvell,armada-3700-sdhci" in the
> >>> armada-37xx SoC dtsi so this combination is added to the new binding
> >>> document.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> >>> ---
> >>>
> >>> Notes:
> >>> Changes in v4:
> >>> - Add review from Krzysztof
> >>> - Squash in addition of marvell,sdhci-xenon with an explanation in the
> >>> commit message
> >>> Changes in v3:
> >>> - Don't accept ap807 without ap806
> >>> - Add ref: string for pad-type
> >>> Changes in v2:
> >>> - Update MAINTAINERS entry
> >>> - Incorporate feedback from Krzysztof
> >>>
> >>> .../bindings/mmc/marvell,xenon-sdhci.txt | 173 -----------
> >>> .../bindings/mmc/marvell,xenon-sdhci.yaml | 275 ++++++++++++++++++
> >>> MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
> >>> 3 files changed, 276 insertions(+), 174 deletions(-)
> >>> delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/marvell,xenon-sdhci.txt
> >>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/marvell,xenon-sdhci.yaml
> >>>
> >> My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
> >> on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
> >>
> >> yamllint warnings/errors:
> >>
> >> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> >> /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/marvell,xenon-sdhci.example.dt.yaml: mmc@...000: compatible: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed:
> >> ['marvell,armada-3700-sdhci'] is too short
> >> 'marvell,armada-3700-sdhci' is not one of ['marvell,armada-cp110-sdhci', 'marvell,armada-ap806-sdhci']
> >> 'marvell,armada-ap807-sdhci' was expected
> >> From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/marvell,xenon-sdhci.yaml
> >> /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/marvell,xenon-sdhci.example.dt.yaml: mmc@...000: compatible: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed:
> >> ['marvell,armada-3700-sdhci'] is too short
> >> 'marvell,armada-3700-sdhci' is not one of ['marvell,armada-cp110-sdhci', 'marvell,armada-ap806-sdhci']
> >> 'marvell,armada-ap807-sdhci' was expected
> >> From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/marvell,xenon-sdhci.yaml
> >>
> >> doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):
> > Chris, your own dt binding does not pass it's check (example)...
> >
> > After updating the compatibles, you need to check the example. The
> > examples are anyway duplicating common stuff, so half of them could be
> > removed.
>
> Yeah silly me. I started taking short cuts to run dt_binding_check
> dtbs_check as one command but then the dt_bindings_check output scrolled
> off the top of my terminal.
>
> As for the examples themselves I want to leave what's there as a fairly
> direct translation of the old binding. If we consider them unnecessary
> removing them can be done as a follow-up.
The examples cannot have warnings/errors.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists