linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: mm: Do not defer reserve_crashkernel() if only ZONE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9e8f32c4-1198-dca5-915f-0b31ce1436b4@linux.microsoft.com>
Date:   Tue, 29 Mar 2022 15:29:41 -0700
From:   Vijay Balakrishna <vijayb@...ux.microsoft.com>
To:     Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: mm: Do not defer reserve_crashkernel() if only
 ZONE_DMA32



On 3/24/2022 10:53 PM, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> The kernel could be benifit due to BLOCK_MAPPINGS, see commit
> 031495635b46 ("arm64: Do not defer reserve_crashkernel() for
> platforms with no DMA memory zones"), if there is only with
> ZONE_DMA32, we could set arm64_dma_phys_limit to max_zone_phys(32)
> earlier in arm64_memblock_init(), then we will benifit too.

Thanks for noticing platforms with just ZONE_DMA32 config can also 
benefit BLOCK_MAPPINGS.  I assume you have access to one where you 
notice the difference with proposed changes and able to test.  I did 
test proposed changes on SoC we use with IOMMU (no ZONE_DMA configs 
enabled).

Nits --
- benifit -> benefit
- consider making commit message clear, "then we will.." seems you are 
referring to platforms with just ZONE_DMA32 config enabled
- to reflect new change consider updating comment added in commit 
031495635b46

> 
> Cc: Vijay Balakrishna <vijayb@...ux.microsoft.com>
> Cc: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>

Reviewed-by: Vijay Balakrishna <vijayb@...ux.microsoft.com>

> ---
>   arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
>   arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c  |  6 ++----
>   2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> index 8ac25f19084e..9dded8779d72 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> @@ -157,14 +157,14 @@ static phys_addr_t __init max_zone_phys(unsigned int zone_bits)
>   	return min(zone_mask, memblock_end_of_DRAM() - 1) + 1;
>   }
>   
> +phys_addr_t __ro_after_init dma32_phys_limit;
>   static void __init zone_sizes_init(unsigned long min, unsigned long max)
>   {
>   	unsigned long max_zone_pfns[MAX_NR_ZONES]  = {0};
> -	unsigned int __maybe_unused acpi_zone_dma_bits;
> -	unsigned int __maybe_unused dt_zone_dma_bits;
> -	phys_addr_t __maybe_unused dma32_phys_limit = max_zone_phys(32);
> -
>   #ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
> +	unsigned int acpi_zone_dma_bits;
> +	unsigned int dt_zone_dma_bits;
> +
>   	acpi_zone_dma_bits = fls64(acpi_iort_dma_get_max_cpu_address());
>   	dt_zone_dma_bits = fls64(of_dma_get_max_cpu_address(NULL));
>   	zone_dma_bits = min3(32U, dt_zone_dma_bits, acpi_zone_dma_bits);
> @@ -173,8 +173,6 @@ static void __init zone_sizes_init(unsigned long min, unsigned long max)
>   #endif
>   #ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32
>   	max_zone_pfns[ZONE_DMA32] = PFN_DOWN(dma32_phys_limit);
> -	if (!arm64_dma_phys_limit)
> -		arm64_dma_phys_limit = dma32_phys_limit;
>   #endif
>   	max_zone_pfns[ZONE_NORMAL] = max;
>   
> @@ -336,8 +334,12 @@ void __init arm64_memblock_init(void)
>   
>   	early_init_fdt_scan_reserved_mem();
>   
> -	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ZONE_DMA) && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32))
> +	dma32_phys_limit = max_zone_phys(32);
> +	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ZONE_DMA)) {
> +		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32))
> +			arm64_dma_phys_limit = dma32_phys_limit;
>   		reserve_crashkernel();
> +	}
>   
>   	high_memory = __va(memblock_end_of_DRAM() - 1) + 1;
>   }
> @@ -385,7 +387,7 @@ void __init bootmem_init(void)
>   	 * request_standard_resources() depends on crashkernel's memory being
>   	 * reserved, so do it here.
>   	 */
> -	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ZONE_DMA) || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32))
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ZONE_DMA))
>   		reserve_crashkernel();
>   
>   	memblock_dump_all();
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> index 626ec32873c6..23734481318a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> @@ -529,8 +529,7 @@ static void __init map_mem(pgd_t *pgdp)
>   
>   #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE
>   	if (crash_mem_map) {
> -		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ZONE_DMA) ||
> -		    IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32))
> +		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ZONE_DMA))
>   			flags |= NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS | NO_CONT_MAPPINGS;
>   		else if (crashk_res.end)
>   			memblock_mark_nomap(crashk_res.start,
> @@ -571,8 +570,7 @@ static void __init map_mem(pgd_t *pgdp)
>   	 * through /sys/kernel/kexec_crash_size interface.
>   	 */
>   #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE
> -	if (crash_mem_map &&
> -	    !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ZONE_DMA) && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32)) {
> +	if (crash_mem_map && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ZONE_DMA)) {
>   		if (crashk_res.end) {
>   			__map_memblock(pgdp, crashk_res.start,
>   				       crashk_res.end + 1,