[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220329065357.h3tx3nm5osmmgxfs@basti-XPS-13-9310>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 08:53:57 +0200
From: Sebastian Fricke <sebastian.fricke@...labora.com>
To: Jernej Škrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, acourbot@...omium.org,
tfiga@...omium.org, hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
"open list:STAGING SUBSYSTEM" <linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev>,
"moderated list:ARM/Allwinner sunXi SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:ARM/Allwinner sunXi SoC support"
<linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/2] staging: media: cedrus: Rename H265 to HEVC
Hey Jernej,
On 28.03.2022 19:09, Jernej Škrabec wrote:
>Hi Sebastian!
>
>Dne nedelja, 27. marec 2022 ob 10:43:10 CEST je Sebastian Fricke napisal(a):
>> Rename all instances where the identifier H265 is used with HEVC.
>> The codec has multiple identifiers H.265 (ITU-T), MPEG-H Part 2 (ISO),
>> but the actual name of the codec is HEVC (High Efficiency Video Coding).
>> Also nearly all other related drivers use the term HEVC instead of H265.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Fricke <sebastian.fricke@...labora.com>
>
>This patch is not constructive. I admit, it's unfortunate it's not using same
>name as other drivers, but anyone dealing with HEVC will know H265 is synonym
>for it. This patch doesn't improve anything and actually makes any fix harder
>to backport, if something cames up. According to diffstat, this rewrites more
>than 50% of cedrus_h265.c, including renaming the file. Additionally, it's easy
>to miss something to rename and we could play this game in the future too, for
>no real benefit.
>
>So NAK.
Alright, thank you for presenting your view on that topic. I'll drop this patch.
>
>Best regard,
>Jernej
>
>P.S. Please wait at least few days before resending patches, even if you find
>something. After all, RFC patches are meant to get some response, it's not
>expected they will be perfect.
Thanks for the tip, I'll be honest, I was bascically just ashamed that I
missed those variables even after extensive grepping that I thought I
better fix this up quickly instead of dumping trash on the mailing list.
Greetings,
Sebastian
>
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/media/sunxi/cedrus/Makefile | 2 +-
>> drivers/staging/media/sunxi/cedrus/cedrus.c | 30 +-
>> drivers/staging/media/sunxi/cedrus/cedrus.h | 14 +-
>> .../staging/media/sunxi/cedrus/cedrus_dec.c | 10 +-
>> .../cedrus/{cedrus_h265.c => cedrus_hevc.c} | 438 +++++++++---------
>> .../staging/media/sunxi/cedrus/cedrus_hw.c | 4 +-
>> .../staging/media/sunxi/cedrus/cedrus_regs.h | 394 ++++++++--------
>> .../staging/media/sunxi/cedrus/cedrus_video.c | 4 +-
>> 8 files changed, 448 insertions(+), 448 deletions(-)
>> rename drivers/staging/media/sunxi/cedrus/{cedrus_h265.c => cedrus_hevc.c}
>> (53%)
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists