[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YkLkV2mvHJ/EyVMn@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 11:49:59 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Cédric Le Goater <clg@...d.org>
Cc: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>,
Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@...com>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org, Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>,
Chin-Ting Kuo <chin-ting_kuo@...eedtech.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tao Ren <rentao.bupt@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/11] spi: spi-mem: Convert Aspeed SMC driver to
spi-mem
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 10:56:49AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> This patchset was sent a bit early and commit 7f852ec58af6 ("mtd: aspeed-smc:
> improve probe resilience") was applied after which conflicts with the removal
> of the aspeed-smc.c file.
> Would you prefer a rebase and resend ? on -rc2 when the tree is stabilized ?
A rebase on -rc1 (assuming the change makes it in there) would be good.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists