[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220329113843.nngzktxoa6c5vxcw@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 17:08:43 +0530
From: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@...com>
To: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>
CC: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>, <kbuild-all@...ts.01.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@...inx.com>,
Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>,
Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
<linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: fix minmax.cocci warnings
On 28/03/22 11:28AM, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On 26/03/22 2:00 pm, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> >
> > Use min to simplify the code.
> >
> > Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/misc/minmax.cocci
> >
> > Fixes: 2747bc2106aa ("mtd: spi-nor: Add dual parallel and stacked mode support")
> > CC: Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@...inx.com>
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
> > ---
> >
> > tree: https://github.com/Xilinx/linux-xlnx xlnx_rebase_v5.15_LTS
> > head: 1870e0fa79a9d58c6748c34550f3ccea0b515933
> > commit: 2747bc2106aa429773d9a932c799aa6229595148 [840/1029] mtd: spi-nor: Add dual parallel and stacked mode support
> > :::::: branch date: 34 hours ago
> > :::::: commit date: 8 weeks ago
> >
> > drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c | 5 +----
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> > @@ -2034,10 +2034,7 @@ static int spi_nor_read(struct mtd_info
> > (offset << nor->shift);
> > }
> > }
> > - if (len < rem_bank_len)
> > - read_len = len;
> > - else
> > - read_len = rem_bank_len;
> > + read_len = min(len, rem_bank_len);
>
> This chunk does not exist in mainline. Seems like xlnx local changes.
Yes. I was very confused for a bit until I realized. It would be nice if
upstream maintainers and mailing lists were not Cced if the patch does
not target the mainline branch.
--
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
Texas Instruments Inc.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists