lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YkQPefdRc+hxIXEV@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date:   Wed, 30 Mar 2022 10:06:17 +0200
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
To:     Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@...sung.com>
Cc:     minchan@...nel.org, ngupta@...are.org, senozhatsky@...omium.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, s.suk@...sung.com,
        jaewon31.kim@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zram_drv: add __GFP_NOWARN flag on call to zs_malloc

On Wed 30-03-22 14:25:02, Jaewon Kim wrote:
> The page allocation with GFP_NOIO may fail. And zram can handle this
> allocation failure. We do not need to print log for this.

GFP_NOIO doesn't have any special meaning wrt to failures. zram
allocates from the memory reclaim context which is a bad design IMHO.
The failure you are seeing indicates that PF_MEMALLOC context (memory
reclaim) which is allow to dip into memory reserves without any limit
cannot find any memory! This is really bad and it is good to learn about
that.

Your description doesn't really explain why we should be ignoring that
situation. Is the memory allocation failure gracefully recoverable?

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ