linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] media: staging: atomisp: rework reading the id and revision values

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 30 Mar 2022 13:33:14 +0300
From:   Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
Cc:     mchehab@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, nathan@...nel.org,
        ndesaulniers@...gle.com, hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl, vrzh@...h.net,
        tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: staging: atomisp: rework reading the id and
 revision values

Hi Tom,

On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 04:21:20PM -0700, Tom Rix wrote:
> I'll do a resend.
> 
> I use git send-mail, sooo not sure what went wrong.

The resent patch also has the same Content-type. I looked a bit further and
it seems that this is very probably added by our mail system somehow: it's
not present on the patch I received through a different route. Weird.

git format-patch only seems to add the header sometimes based on some
obscure criteria. It's the first time I see such a problem. It'd at least
help if the Content-type would always be there but that's certainly out of
scope of the patch.

-- 
Regards,

Sakari Ailus