lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 30 Mar 2022 13:50:35 +0300
From:   Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>
To:     Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
Cc:     mchehab@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, nathan@...nel.org,
        ndesaulniers@...gle.com, hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl, vrzh@...h.net,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: staging: atomisp: rework reading the id and
 revision values

On 30/03/2022 13:33, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> 
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 04:21:20PM -0700, Tom Rix wrote:
>> I'll do a resend.
>>
>> I use git send-mail, sooo not sure what went wrong.
> 
> The resent patch also has the same Content-type. I looked a bit further and
> it seems that this is very probably added by our mail system somehow: it's
> not present on the patch I received through a different route. Weird.

Well... For me, the original patch in this thread was text/plain. But 
the [RESEND PATCH] was application/octet-stream, and Thunderbird shows 
it as empty body with an unnamed attachment.

  Tomi

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ