lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <73a4a16b-193a-3075-61e9-82bcf21fc7d2@phytec.de>
Date:   Wed, 30 Mar 2022 15:55:45 +0200
From:   Wadim Egorov <w.egorov@...tec.de>
To:     Bryan Brattlof <bb@...com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>
CC:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] arm64: dts: ti: introduce a minimal am642 device tree

Hi Bryan,

> +/* (optional) for console */
> +&main_uart0 {
> +	pinctrl-names = "default";
> +	pinctrl-0 = <&main_uart0_pins_default>;
> +};
> +
> +/* reserved for firmware */
> +&main_uart1 {
> +	status = "reserved";
> +};

k3-image-gen says UART0 is used as a debug interface. See

 
https://git.ti.com/cgit/k3-image-gen/k3-image-gen/tree/soc/am64x/evm/board-cfg.c#n81

So it seems that you can enable uart1 here. But people may run into a 
conflict with uart0 and k3-image-gen compiled with ENABLE_TRACE=1.

If I am wrong, can you please clarify why you mark uart1 as reserved.

Regards,
Wadim

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ