lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5558288.DvuYhMxLoT@leap>
Date:   Thu, 31 Mar 2022 18:58:58 +0200
From:   "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     sparmaintainer@...sys.com, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, outreachy@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: unisys: Remove "struct dentry *eth_debugfs_dir"

On gioved? 31 marzo 2022 10:22:02 CEST Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 08:47:51AM +0200, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> > There is no need for "struct dentry *eth_debugfs_dir" which is used for
> > debug / sysfs directories. Therefore, remove this "struct dentry" and
> > everything related (i.e., creation and removal).
> > 
> > As a side effect of this change, the code has no more need of the
> > "cleanup_register_netdev" label, which can also be removed.
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> > Suggested-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > v1 - v2: Add a couple of "Suggested-by" tags which were forgotten. 
> > Thanks to Dan Carpenter and Greg Kroah-Hartman.
> > 
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter
> 
I've just noticed that visornic and visorhba do other calls to 
debugfs_create_dir() and debugfs_create_file() functions.

I'm not sure whether or not this driver still needs those other calls.

Do you think that they should be removed as well as it has been done 
in the patch above?

Thanks,

Fabio M. De Francesco



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ