[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YkdvzIyz/WGlm2uy@iweiny-desk3>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 14:34:04 -0700
From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
To: Sevinj Aghayeva <sevinj.aghayeva@...il.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
outreachy@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: simplify control flow
On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 07:46:35AM -0400, Sevinj Aghayeva wrote:
> The function iterates an index from 0 to NUM_PMKID_CACHE and returns
> the first index for which the condition is true. If no such index is
> found, the function returns -1. Current code has a complex control
> flow that obfuscates this simple task. Replace it with a loop.
>
> Also, given the shortened function body, replace the long variable
> name psecuritypriv with a short variable name p.
>
> Reported by checkpatch:
>
> WARNING: else is not generally useful after a break or return
>
> Signed-off-by: Sevinj Aghayeva <sevinj.aghayeva@...il.com>
Wow! Nice find! This is a huge clean up. Extra kudos recognizing that it is
not just the else statement which is broken here!
The only issue for the patch is that I don't see any maintainer emailed?
However, I don't see a maintainer listed in the MAINTAINERS file so ...
Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c | 28 ++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c
> index d5bb3a5bd2fb..3eacf8f9d236 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c
> @@ -2036,28 +2036,14 @@ int rtw_restruct_wmm_ie(struct adapter *adapter, u8 *in_ie, u8 *out_ie, uint in_
>
> static int SecIsInPMKIDList(struct adapter *Adapter, u8 *bssid)
> {
> - struct security_priv *psecuritypriv = &Adapter->securitypriv;
> - int i = 0;
> -
> - do {
> - if ((psecuritypriv->PMKIDList[i].bUsed) &&
> - (!memcmp(psecuritypriv->PMKIDList[i].Bssid, bssid, ETH_ALEN))) {
> - break;
> - } else {
> - i++;
> - /* continue; */
> - }
> -
> - } while (i < NUM_PMKID_CACHE);
> -
> - if (i == NUM_PMKID_CACHE) {
> - i = -1;/* Could not find. */
> - } else {
> - /* There is one Pre-Authentication Key for the specific BSSID. */
> - }
> -
> - return i;
> + struct security_priv *p = &Adapter->securitypriv;
> + int i;
>
> + for (i = 0; i < NUM_PMKID_CACHE; i++)
> + if ((p->PMKIDList[i].bUsed) &&
> + (!memcmp(p->PMKIDList[i].Bssid, bssid, ETH_ALEN)))
> + return i;
> + return -1;
> }
>
> /* */
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists