[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8a430ab7-024f-51a9-d785-07e03f163261@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2022 12:47:43 +0200
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To: Werner Sembach <wse@...edocomputers.com>,
dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, tiwai@...e.de, mpdesouza@...e.com,
arnd@...db.de, samuel@...oj.net, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] input/i8042: Rework quirk tables
Hi,
On 3/29/22 16:36, Werner Sembach wrote:
> Revision 5 with some fixes based on feedback by Hans de Goede.
>
> The 1st patch is minor housekeeping.
>
> The 2nd patch merges the tables together. Minor fixes in 5th revision and
> no more duplication of ASUS devices
>
> The 3rd patch add optional debug output to see which quirks get applied. In
> 5th revision this no longer breaks compilation on non x86 platforms.
>
> The 4th patch adds a list of Clevo devices that need multiple quirks.
> With the reworked table they don't need to be inserted multiple times now,
> which was required in v1 and v2 of this patch.
>
> I also included the extra quirk for the Clevo NS7xMU, which was a separate
> patch before.
>
> The added Clevo devices are now only identified by their board name as this
> is the only somewhat reliable string that might not be changed by resellers.
Thanks, the entire series looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
for the series.
Regards,
Hans
p.s.
In the future if you get a Reviewed-by to a previous version of a patch
and the patch does not change (or does not change much, e.g. only
small code-style / comment typo tweaks) you can keep that Reviewed-by
for next versions of the patch, just copy it over to your commit
msg and put it directly above your own S-o-b line.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists