linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5] input/i8042: Rework quirk tables

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1754062e-0d2a-9400-fe41-5434933fb9ca@tuxedocomputers.com>
Date:   Mon, 4 Apr 2022 16:36:24 +0200
From:   Werner Sembach <wse@...edocomputers.com>
To:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com,
        tiwai@...e.de, mpdesouza@...e.com, arnd@...db.de, samuel@...oj.net,
        linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] input/i8042: Rework quirk tables


Am 02.04.22 um 12:47 schrieb Hans de Goede:
> Hi,
>
> On 3/29/22 16:36, Werner Sembach wrote:
>> Revision 5 with some fixes based on feedback by Hans de Goede.
>>
>> The 1st patch is minor housekeeping.
>>
>> The 2nd patch merges the tables together. Minor fixes in 5th revision and
>> no more duplication of ASUS devices
>>
>> The 3rd patch add optional debug output to see which quirks get applied. In
>> 5th revision this no longer breaks compilation on non x86 platforms.
>>
>> The 4th patch adds a list of Clevo devices that need multiple quirks.
>> With the reworked table they don't need to be inserted multiple times now,
>> which was required in v1 and v2 of this patch.
>>
>> I also included the extra quirk for the Clevo NS7xMU, which was a separate
>> patch before.
>>
>> The added Clevo devices are now only identified by their board name as this
>> is the only somewhat reliable string that might not be changed by resellers.
> Thanks, the entire series looks good to me:
>
> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
>
> for the series.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
>
>
> p.s.
>
> In the future if you get a Reviewed-by to a previous version of a patch
> and the patch does not change (or does not change much, e.g. only
> small code-style / comment typo tweaks) you can keep that Reviewed-by
> for next versions of the patch, just copy it over to your commit
> msg and put it directly above your own S-o-b line.
>
>
OK, thanks