[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ac0e3336-f9eb-def9-68ea-ab49e2c467a1@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2022 13:31:22 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Jia-Wei Chang <jia-wei.chang@...iatek.com>,
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
fan.chen@...iatek.com, louis.yu@...iatek.com,
roger.lu@...iatek.com, Allen-yy.Lin@...iatek.com,
Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com,
hsinyi@...gle.com,
Jia-Wei Chang <jia-wei.chang@...iatek.corp-partner.google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: devfreq: mediatek: add mtk cci devfreq
dt-bindings
On 01/04/2022 15:39, Jia-Wei Chang wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +
>>>>> + operating-points-v2:
>>>>> + description:
>>>>> + For details, please refer to
>>>>> + Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-v2.yaml
>>>>> +
>>>>> + opp-table: true
>>>>
>>>> Same comments as your CPU freq bindings apply.
>>>
>>> mtk-cci-devfreq is a new driver and its arch is same as mediatek-
>>> cpufreq so that the properties of mtk-cci are refer to mediatek-
>>> cpufreq
>>> bindings.
>>> operating-point-v2 is used to determine the voltage and frequency
>>> of
>>> dvfs which is further utilized by mtk-cci-devfreq.
>>
>> "operating-point-v2" is understood, but the same as in cpufreq
>> bindings,
>> I am questioning why do you have "opp-table: true". It's a bit
>> confusing, so maybe I miss something?
>
> Yes, you're correct.
> "opp-table: true" should be removed.
> I messed it up.
No, I think I was wrong. The opp-table pretty frequently is embedded in
the the device node itself. The operating-points-v2 references it.
You don't use it in the example, but it might be a valid usage, so it
can stay. Sorry for the confusion, it passed some time since I looked at
OPP bindings.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists