[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ykg0Qw24PuGCnbLT@eze-laptop>
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2022 08:32:19 -0300
From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar>
To: Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas.dufresne@...labora.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
kernel@...labora.com, Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Sebastian Fricke <sebastian.fricke@...labora.com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 15/23] media: rkvdec: h264: Validate and use pic width
and height in mbs
Hi Nicolas,
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 03:37:17PM -0400, Nicolas Dufresne wrote:
> From: Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>
>
> The width and height in macroblocks is currently configured based on OUTPUT
> buffer resolution, this works for frame pictures but can cause issues for
> field pictures.
>
> When frame_mbs_only_flag is 0 the height in mbs should be height of
> the field instead of height of frame.
>
> Validate pic_width_in_mbs_minus1 and pic_height_in_map_units_minus1
> against OUTPUT buffer resolution and use these values to configure HW.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas.dufresne@...labora.com>
> Reviewed-by: Sebastian Fricke <sebastian.fricke@...labora.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec-h264.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec-h264.c b/drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec-h264.c
> index 8d44a884a52e..a42cf19bcc6d 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec-h264.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec-h264.c
> @@ -672,8 +672,8 @@ static void assemble_hw_pps(struct rkvdec_ctx *ctx,
> LOG2_MAX_PIC_ORDER_CNT_LSB_MINUS4);
> WRITE_PPS(!!(sps->flags & V4L2_H264_SPS_FLAG_DELTA_PIC_ORDER_ALWAYS_ZERO),
> DELTA_PIC_ORDER_ALWAYS_ZERO_FLAG);
> - WRITE_PPS(DIV_ROUND_UP(ctx->coded_fmt.fmt.pix_mp.width, 16), PIC_WIDTH_IN_MBS);
> - WRITE_PPS(DIV_ROUND_UP(ctx->coded_fmt.fmt.pix_mp.height, 16), PIC_HEIGHT_IN_MBS);
Please add a comment so we don't forget why we use the bitstream
fields here.
> + WRITE_PPS(sps->pic_width_in_mbs_minus1 + 1, PIC_WIDTH_IN_MBS);
> + WRITE_PPS(sps->pic_height_in_map_units_minus1 + 1, PIC_HEIGHT_IN_MBS);
> WRITE_PPS(!!(sps->flags & V4L2_H264_SPS_FLAG_FRAME_MBS_ONLY),
> FRAME_MBS_ONLY_FLAG);
> WRITE_PPS(!!(sps->flags & V4L2_H264_SPS_FLAG_MB_ADAPTIVE_FRAME_FIELD),
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec.c b/drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec.c
> index 2df8cf4883e2..1b805710e195 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec.c
> @@ -29,8 +29,11 @@
>
> static int rkvdec_try_ctrl(struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl)
> {
> + struct rkvdec_ctx *ctx = container_of(ctrl->handler, struct rkvdec_ctx, ctrl_hdl);
> +
> if (ctrl->id == V4L2_CID_STATELESS_H264_SPS) {
> const struct v4l2_ctrl_h264_sps *sps = ctrl->p_new.p_h264_sps;
> + unsigned int width, height;
> /*
> * TODO: The hardware supports 10-bit and 4:2:2 profiles,
> * but it's currently broken in the driver.
> @@ -45,6 +48,13 @@ static int rkvdec_try_ctrl(struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl)
> if (sps->bit_depth_luma_minus8 != 0)
> /* Only 8-bit is supported */
> return -EINVAL;
> +
> + width = (sps->pic_width_in_mbs_minus1 + 1) * 16;
> + height = (sps->pic_height_in_map_units_minus1 + 1) * 16;
> +
Let's please add a comment here, clarifying it's legal to check
the coded format (OUTPUT queue format) at .try_ctrl time,
because the stateless decoder specification [1] mandates
S_FMT on the OUTPUT queue, before passing the SPS/PPS controls.
[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/userspace-api/media/v4l/dev-stateless-decoder.html
> + if (width > ctx->coded_fmt.fmt.pix_mp.width ||
> + height > ctx->coded_fmt.fmt.pix_mp.height)
Can you add a debug message or error message?
These silent errors tend to get super hard to track.
With these changes:
Reviewed-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar>
Thanks,
Ezequiel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists