[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220402175131.75bb95de@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2022 17:51:31 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iio:proximity:sx9324: Fix hardware gain read/write
On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 22:25:31 +0200
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org> wrote:
> Quoting Jonathan Cameron (2022-03-27 07:51:47)
> > On Thu, 24 Mar 2022 15:29:28 -0700
> > Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org> wrote:
> >
> > > There are four possible gain values according to 'sx9324_gain_vals[]':
> > >
> > > 1, 2, 4, and 8
> > >
> > > The values are off by one when writing and reading the register. The
> > > bits should be set according to this equation:
> > >
> > > ilog2(<gain>) + 1
> > >
> > > so that a gain of 8 is 0x3 in the register field and a gain of 4 is 0x2
> > > in the register field, etc
> >
> > Example seems wrong...
> >
> > ilog2(8) + 1 = 3 + 1 = 0x4
> > ilog2(4) + 1 = 2 + 1 = 0x3
> > ilog2(2) + 1 = 1 + 1 = 0x2
> > ilog2(1) + 1 = 0 + 1 = 0x1
> > 0x0 reserved.
> >
> > or have I misunderstood?
>
> Nope. I hit the wrong key but your table is correct. Can you fix it when
> applying?
Done and applied to the fixes-togreg branch of iio.git but I haven't pushed
it out yet as I want to rebase that tree on rc1 when it comes out.
After that, please take a quick look check I didn't mess up.
Thanks,
Jonathan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists