linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] topology: make core_mask include at least cluster

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGsJ_4yUJXvLsGAmZ6fpHmccMLanFVVSiod_Agr+Uqzcu83h1g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 5 Apr 2022 18:38:01 +1200
From:   Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>
To:     Darren Hart <darren@...amperecomputing.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Arm <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Barry Song <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>,
        Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
        "D . Scott Phillips" <scott@...amperecomputing.com>,
        Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@...amperecomputing.com>,
        Carl Worth <carl@...amperecomputing.com>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] topology: make core_mask include at least cluster_siblings

On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 3:46 PM Darren Hart
<darren@...amperecomputing.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 04:40:37PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> > Ampere Altra defines CPU clusters in the ACPI PPTT. They share a Snoop
> > Control Unit, but have no shared CPU-side last level cache.
> >
> > cpu_coregroup_mask() will return a cpumask with weight 1, while
> > cpu_clustergroup_mask() will return a cpumask with weight 2.
> >
> > As a result, build_sched_domain() will BUG() once per CPU with:
> >
> > BUG: arch topology borken
> > the CLS domain not a subset of the MC domain
> >
> > The MC level cpumask is then extended to that of the CLS child, and is
> > later removed entirely as redundant. This sched domain topology is an
> > improvement over previous topologies, or those built without
> > SCHED_CLUSTER, particularly for certain latency sensitive workloads.
> > With the current scheduler model and heuristics, this is a desirable
> > default topology for Ampere Altra and Altra Max system.
> >
> > Rather than create a custom sched domains topology structure and
> > introduce new logic in arch/arm64 to detect these systems, update the
> > core_mask so coregroup is never a subset of clustergroup, extending it
> > to cluster_siblings if necessary. Only do this if CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER
> > is enabled to avoid also changing the topology (MC) when
> > CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER is disabled.
> >
> > This has the added benefit over a custom topology of working for both
> > symmetric and asymmetric topologies. It does not address systems where
> > the CLUSTER topology is above a populated MC topology, but these are not
> > considered today and can be addressed separately if and when they
> > appear.
> >
> > The final sched domain topology for a 2 socket Ampere Altra system is
> > unchanged with or without CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER, and the BUG is avoided:
> >
> > For CPU0:
> >
> > CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER=y
> > CLS  [0-1]
> > DIE  [0-79]
> > NUMA [0-159]
> >
> > CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER is not set
> > DIE  [0-79]
> > NUMA [0-159]
> >
> > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> > Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
> > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> > Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> > Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
> > Cc: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>
> > Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
> > Cc: D. Scott Phillips <scott@...amperecomputing.com>
> > Cc: Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@...amperecomputing.com>
> > Cc: Carl Worth <carl@...amperecomputing.com>
> > Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 5.16.x
> > Suggested-by: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <darren@...amperecomputing.com>
> > ---
> > v1: Drop MC level if coregroup weight == 1
> > v2: New sd topo in arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> > v3: No new topo, extend core_mask to cluster_siblings
> > v4: Rebase on 5.18-rc1 for GregKH to pull. Add IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER).
>
> A bit more context on the state of review:
>
> Several folks reviewed, but I didn't add their Reviewed-by since I added the
> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER) test since they reviewed it last. This change
> preserves the stated intent of the change when CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER is disabled.

Everything still works even without IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER), right?
Anyway, putting IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER) seems to be right as
well.
But it seems it is still a good choice to put all these reviewed-by
and acked-by you got in
v3? I don't  think the added IS_ENABLED will change their decisions.

>
> Barry Song - Suggested this approach
> Vincent Guittot - informal review with reservations
> Sudeep Holla - Acked-by
> Dietmar Eggemann - informal review (added to Cc, apologies for the omission Dietmar)
>
> All but Barry's recommendation captured in the v3 thread:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/f1deaeabfd31fdf512ff6502f38186ef842c2b1f.1646413117.git.darren@os.amperecomputing.com/
>
> Thanks,
>
> >
> >  drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 9 +++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> > index 1d6636ebaac5..5497c5ab7318 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> > @@ -667,6 +667,15 @@ const struct cpumask *cpu_coregroup_mask(int cpu)
> >                       core_mask = &cpu_topology[cpu].llc_sibling;
> >       }
> >
> > +     /*
> > +      * For systems with no shared cpu-side LLC but with clusters defined,
> > +      * extend core_mask to cluster_siblings. The sched domain builder will
> > +      * then remove MC as redundant with CLS if SCHED_CLUSTER is enabled.
> > +      */
> > +     if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER) &&
> > +         cpumask_subset(core_mask, &cpu_topology[cpu].cluster_sibling))
> > +             core_mask = &cpu_topology[cpu].cluster_sibling;
> > +
> >       return core_mask;
> >  }
> >
> --
> Darren Hart
> Ampere Computing / OS and Kernel

Thanks
Barry