[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE-0n52hZy6ia3i0yv9U_1TnqDf-NAW3587RSS_qG+GRNhh3yg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 14:08:04 -0500
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Satya Priya <quic_c_skakit@...cinc.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
quic_collinsd@...cinc.com, quic_subbaram@...cinc.com,
quic_jprakash@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 3/6] mfd: pm8008: Add mfd cell struct to register LDOs
Quoting Satya Priya (2022-04-05 06:50:30)
> Add mfd cell struct to match with the "qcom,pm8008-regulator"
> driver and a separate probe to add pm8008_regulator_devs.
> This separate probe is required to ensure the regulators are
> registered only with the mfd device which contains regulators.
I don't get it. Shouldn't the pm8008-regulators compatible string be a
different i2c driver in drivers/regulator/ that matches the compatible
string for qcom,pm8008-regulators?
>
> Add the reset-gpio toggling in the pm8008_probe() to bring
> pm8008 chip out of reset instead of doing it in DT node using
> "output-high" property.
Please split this part off to a different patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists