[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220405192757.v356zx2u4mpgpnlq@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 00:57:57 +0530
From: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@...com>
To: Cédric Le Goater <clg@...d.org>
CC: <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
<linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org>, Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>,
Chin-Ting Kuo <chin-ting_kuo@...eedtech.com>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Tao Ren <rentao.bupt@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/11] spi: aspeed: Add support for direct mapping
On 04/04/22 09:11AM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 3/30/22 21:45, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> > On 25/03/22 11:08AM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> > > Use direct mapping to read the flash device contents. This operation
> > > mode is called "Command mode" on Aspeed SoC SMC controllers. It uses a
> > > Control Register for the settings to apply when a memory operation is
> > > performed on the flash device mapping window.
> > >
> > > If the window is not big enough, fall back to the "User mode" to
> > > perform the read.
> > >
> > > Since direct mapping now handles all reads of the flash device
> > > contents, also use memcpy_fromio for other address spaces, such as
> > > SFDP.
> > >
> > > Direct mapping for writes will come later when validated.
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>
> > > Tested-by: Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>
> > > Tested-by: Tao Ren <rentao.bupt@...il.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@...d.org>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/spi/spi-aspeed-smc.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > > 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-aspeed-smc.c b/drivers/spi/spi-aspeed-smc.c
> > > index 997ec2e45118..0951766baef4 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-aspeed-smc.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-aspeed-smc.c
> > > @@ -322,8 +322,8 @@ static int do_aspeed_spi_exec_op(struct spi_mem *mem, const struct spi_mem_op *o
> > > if (!op->addr.nbytes)
> > > ret = aspeed_spi_read_reg(chip, op);
> > > else
> > > - ret = aspeed_spi_read_user(chip, op, op->addr.val,
> > > - op->data.nbytes, op->data.buf.in);
> > > + memcpy_fromio(op->data.buf.in, chip->ahb_base + op->addr.val,
> > > + op->data.nbytes);
> >
> > I think I commented on this earlier too, though I failed to respond to
> > your reply. Let me bring the topic back up. I think this can cause an
> > invalid memory address to be accessed. Not all SPI MEM consumers will
> > use dirmap APIs, and they won't use them all the time. For example, SPI
> > NOR can perform some operations to reset the flash before shutting down.
> > For example, SPI NOR turns off 4byte address mode during shutdown. This
> > will be a register read/write operation, which usually has a different
> > opcode.
>
> It's only a small optimization for startup when the SFDP probing is done.
> There are quite a few reads which are large :
>
> spi-aspeed-smc 1e630000.spi: CE0 read OP 0x5a mode:1.1.1.1 naddr:0x3 ndummies:0x1 len:0x10
> spi-aspeed-smc 1e630000.spi: CE0 read OP 0x5a mode:1.1.1.1 naddr:0x3 ndummies:0x1 len:0x10
> spi-aspeed-smc 1e630000.spi: CE0 read OP 0x5a mode:1.1.1.1 naddr:0x3 ndummies:0x1 len:0x120
> spi-aspeed-smc 1e630000.spi: CE0 read OP 0x5a mode:1.1.1.1 naddr:0x3 ndummies:0x1 len:0x40
> spi-aspeed-smc 1e630000.spi: CE0 read OP 0x5a mode:1.1.1.1 naddr:0x3 ndummies:0x1 len:0x8
Is the overhead large enough to cause any significant delays? This would
only happen once, it is not on a hot path.
Anyway, I had not noticed earlier that you set opcode, dummy, etc. in
do_aspeed_spi_exec_op() so I was thinking you would always end up using
the "main" read operation for this.
I am fine with this as long as you add range checks to make sure there
are no overflows.
>
> >
> > So I think you should keep dirmap and exec_op() independent of each
> > other.
>
> OK. I understand. It's not a problem as it works either way.
>
> Thanks,
>
> C.
>
>
> > > } else {
> > > if (!op->addr.nbytes)
> > > ret = aspeed_spi_write_reg(chip, op);
> > > @@ -403,10 +403,73 @@ static int aspeed_spi_chip_set_default_window(struct aspeed_spi_chip *chip)
> > > return chip->ahb_window_size ? 0 : -1;
> > > }
> > > +static int aspeed_spi_dirmap_create(struct spi_mem_dirmap_desc *desc)
> > > +{
> > > + struct aspeed_spi *aspi = spi_controller_get_devdata(desc->mem->spi->master);
> > > + struct aspeed_spi_chip *chip = &aspi->chips[desc->mem->spi->chip_select];
> > > + struct spi_mem_op *op = &desc->info.op_tmpl;
> > > + u32 ctl_val;
> > > + int ret = 0;
> > > +
> > > + chip->clk_freq = desc->mem->spi->max_speed_hz;
> > > +
> > > + /* Only for reads */
> > > + if (op->data.dir != SPI_MEM_DATA_IN)
> > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > +
> > > + if (desc->info.length > chip->ahb_window_size)
> > > + dev_warn(aspi->dev, "CE%d window (%dMB) too small for mapping",
> > > + chip->cs, chip->ahb_window_size >> 20);
> > > +
> > > + /* Define the default IO read settings */
> > > + ctl_val = readl(chip->ctl) & ~CTRL_IO_CMD_MASK;
> > > + ctl_val |= aspeed_spi_get_io_mode(op) |
> > > + op->cmd.opcode << CTRL_COMMAND_SHIFT |
> > > + CTRL_IO_DUMMY_SET(op->dummy.nbytes / op->dummy.buswidth) |
> > > + CTRL_IO_MODE_READ;
> > > +
> > > + /* Tune 4BYTE address mode */
> > > + if (op->addr.nbytes) {
> > > + u32 addr_mode = readl(aspi->regs + CE_CTRL_REG);
> > > +
> > > + if (op->addr.nbytes == 4)
> > > + addr_mode |= (0x11 << chip->cs);
> > > + else
> > > + addr_mode &= ~(0x11 << chip->cs);
> > > + writel(addr_mode, aspi->regs + CE_CTRL_REG);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + /* READ mode is the controller default setting */
> > > + chip->ctl_val[ASPEED_SPI_READ] = ctl_val;
> > > + writel(chip->ctl_val[ASPEED_SPI_READ], chip->ctl);
> > > +
> > > + dev_info(aspi->dev, "CE%d read buswidth:%d [0x%08x]\n",
> > > + chip->cs, op->data.buswidth, chip->ctl_val[ASPEED_SPI_READ]);
> > > +
> > > + return ret;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static ssize_t aspeed_spi_dirmap_read(struct spi_mem_dirmap_desc *desc,
> > > + u64 offset, size_t len, void *buf)
> > > +{
> > > + struct aspeed_spi *aspi = spi_controller_get_devdata(desc->mem->spi->master);
> > > + struct aspeed_spi_chip *chip = &aspi->chips[desc->mem->spi->chip_select];
> > > +
> > > + /* Switch to USER command mode if mapping window is too small */
> > > + if (chip->ahb_window_size < offset + len)
> > > + aspeed_spi_read_user(chip, &desc->info.op_tmpl, offset, len, buf);
> > > + else
> > > + memcpy_fromio(buf, chip->ahb_base + offset, len);
> > > +
> > > + return len;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static const struct spi_controller_mem_ops aspeed_spi_mem_ops = {
> > > .supports_op = aspeed_spi_supports_op,
> > > .exec_op = aspeed_spi_exec_op,
> > > .get_name = aspeed_spi_get_name,
> > > + .dirmap_create = aspeed_spi_dirmap_create,
> > > + .dirmap_read = aspeed_spi_dirmap_read,
> > > };
> > > static void aspeed_spi_chip_set_type(struct aspeed_spi *aspi, unsigned int cs, int type)
> > > --
> > > 2.34.1
> > >
> >
>
--
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
Texas Instruments Inc.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists