linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net] ipw2x00: use DEVICE_ATTR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87y20iss2a.fsf@tynnyri.adurom.net>
Date:   Wed, 06 Apr 2022 08:23:57 +0300
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
To:     Meng Tang <tangmeng@...ontech.com>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipw2x00: use DEVICE_ATTR_*() macro

Meng Tang <tangmeng@...ontech.com> writes:

> Use DEVICE_ATTR_*() helper instead of plain DEVICE_ATTR,
> which makes the code a bit shorter and easier to read.
>
> Signed-off-by: Meng Tang <tangmeng@...ontech.com>

ipw2x00 patches go to wireless trees, I think for this patch
wireless-next is more approriate than wireless. No need to resend
because of this.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches