[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a984b4d6-bc7d-ef81-8bd6-34d50127174d@opensource.wdc.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 17:10:45 +0900
From: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
To: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] libata: Inline ata_qc_new_init() in
ata_scsi_qc_new()
On 4/6/22 16:16, John Garry wrote:
> On 06/04/2022 02:48, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> On 4/5/22 14:52, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 10:53:10PM +0800, John Garry wrote:
>>>> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
>>>>
>>>> It is a bit pointless to have ata_qc_new_init() in libata-core.c
>>>> since it
>>>> pokes scsi internals, so inline it in ata_scsi_qc_new() (in
>>>> libata-scsi.c).
>>>>
>>>> <Christoph, please provide signed-off-by>
>>>> [jpg, Take Christoph's change from list and form into a patch]
>>>> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
>>>
>>> Although I still think merging the two patches into one to avoid all
>>> the churn would be much better.
>>
>> I agree. Let's merge these 2 patches.
>
> I'd say that they are distinct changes.
>
> Anyway, if that is the preference then who shall be the author?
> Considering I did most effort I will be and add Christoph as
> co-developed-by - please let me know if not ok.
Works for me.
>
> thanks,
> John
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
Powered by blists - more mailing lists