lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 6 Apr 2022 10:18:52 +0200
From:   Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/14] dt-bindings: arm: mediatek: document WED binding
 for MT7622


On 06.04.22 10:09, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 05/04/2022 21:57, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
>> 
>> Document the binding for the Wireless Ethernet Dispatch core on the MT7622
>> SoC, which is used for Ethernet->WLAN offloading
>> Add related info in mediatek-net bindings.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>
> 
> Thank you for your patch. There is something to discuss/improve.
> 
>> ---
>>  .../arm/mediatek/mediatek,mt7622-wed.yaml     | 50 +++++++++++++++++++
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/net/mediatek-net.txt  |  2 +
>>  2 files changed, 52 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mt7622-wed.yaml
> 
> Don't store drivers in arm directory. See:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/YkJa1oLSEP8R4U6y@robh.at.kernel.org/
> 
> Isn't this a network offload engine? If yes, then probably it should be
> in "net/".
It's not a network offload engine by itself. It's a SoC component that 
connects to the offload engine and controls a MTK PCIe WLAN device, 
intercepting interrupts and DMA rings in order to be able to inject 
packets coming in from the offload engine.
Do you think it still belongs in net, or maybe in soc instead?

>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mt7622-wed.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mt7622-wed.yaml
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..787d6673f952
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mt7622-wed.yaml
>> @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
>> +%YAML 1.2
>> +---
>> +$id: "http://devicetree.org/schemas/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mt7622-wed.yaml#"
>> +$schema: "http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#"
>> +
>> +title: MediaTek Wireless Ethernet Dispatch Controller for MT7622
>> +
>> +maintainers:
>> +  - Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
>> +  - Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>
>> +
>> +description:
>> +  The mediatek wireless ethernet dispatch controller can be configured to
>> +  intercept and handle access to the WLAN DMA queues and PCIe interrupts
>> +  and implement hardware flow offloading from ethernet to WLAN.
>> +
>> +properties:
>> +  compatible:
>> +    items:
>> +      - enum:
>> +          - mediatek,mt7622-wed
>> +      - const: syscon
>> +
>> +  reg:
>> +    maxItems: 1
>> +
>> +  interrupts:
>> +    maxItems: 1
>> +
>> +required:
>> +  - compatible
>> +  - reg
>> +  - interrupts
>> +
>> +additionalProperties: false
>> +
>> +examples:
>> +  - |
>> +    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
>> +    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
>> +    soc {
>> +      #address-cells = <2>;
>> +      #size-cells = <2>;
>> +      wed0: wed@...0a000 {
> 
> Generic node name, "wed" is specific. Maybe "network-offload"? Or
> "network-accelerator"? You probably know better what this device does,
> so maybe come with some generic name?
wed stands for "wireless ethernet dispatch". Both network-offload and 
network-accelerator don't really fit. Would it make sense to spell it 
out, or do you have any better naming ideas?

Thanks,

- Felix

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ