[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yk1cnYWF+L+OgoCa@zn.tnic>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 11:25:49 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Wyes Karny <wyes.karny@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lewis.Carroll@....com,
Mario.Limonciello@....com, gautham.shenoy@....com,
Ananth.Narayan@....com, bharata@....com, len.brown@...el.com,
x86@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com, peterz@...radead.org,
chang.seok.bae@...el.com, keescook@...omium.org, metze@...ba.org,
zhengqi.arch@...edance.com, mark.rutland@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Prefer MWAIT over HALT on AMD processors
On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 11:44:52AM +0530, Wyes Karny wrote:
> If x86_FEATURE_ZEN is set and X86_FEATURE_MWAIT is not set or has
> X86_BUG_MONITOR then it won't return correct value.
Can that ever happen on Zen uarch?
Also, what does this mean: "allow MWAIT early on."?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists