[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <738b87e0-85dd-70b4-178b-9c3a9c5a7468@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 14:49:35 +0530
From: "Satya Priya Kakitapalli (Temp)" <quic_c_skakit@...cinc.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
CC: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <quic_collinsd@...cinc.com>,
<quic_subbaram@...cinc.com>, <quic_jprakash@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 3/6] mfd: pm8008: Add mfd cell struct to register LDOs
On 4/6/2022 12:38 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Satya Priya (2022-04-05 06:50:30)
>> Add mfd cell struct to match with the "qcom,pm8008-regulator"
>> driver and a separate probe to add pm8008_regulator_devs.
>> This separate probe is required to ensure the regulators are
>> registered only with the mfd device which contains regulators.
> I don't get it. Shouldn't the pm8008-regulators compatible string be a
> different i2c driver in drivers/regulator/ that matches the compatible
> string for qcom,pm8008-regulators?
Initially we had it that way but as per Mark's suggestion here [1] I've
made these changes to register regulators directly through mfd driver.
[1]
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/patch/1637314953-4215-3-git-send-email-quic_c_skakit@quicinc.com/#24618011
>> Add the reset-gpio toggling in the pm8008_probe() to bring
>> pm8008 chip out of reset instead of doing it in DT node using
>> "output-high" property.
> Please split this part off to a different patch.
Okay.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists