linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 10/11] fs/drop_caches: move drop

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 6 Apr 2022 15:25:44 -0700
From:   Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To:     tangmeng <tangmeng@...ontech.com>
Cc:     viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        keescook@...omium.org, yzaikin@...gle.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        nizhen@...ontech.com, zhanglianjie@...ontech.com,
        nixiaoming@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/11] fs/drop_caches: move drop_caches sysctls to its
 own file

On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 10:48:06AM +0800, tangmeng wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2022/2/27 05:02, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Thanks but please send a v3 including all the other patches as well
> > and collecting the Reviewed/Acked-bys, etc. This can be sent *after*
> > your v3 of the optimization work.
> > 
> I have noticed that there is a conflict between sysctl-next and linux-next.
> Do I resubmit the patch based on linux-next, or after you deal with the
> conflict between sysctl-next and linux-next, I resubmit based on
> sysctl-next？

You can use sysctl-next now to base your development changes. Feel free
to send more changes.

  Luis