[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <835cf881-56ce-93b7-3182-ae35eda2691d@opensource.wdc.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 07:28:27 +0900
From: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
To: "Limonciello, Mario" <Mario.Limonciello@....com>
Cc: "open list:LIBATA SUBSYSTEM (Serial and Parallel ATA drivers)"
<linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"hdegoede@...hat.com" <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ata: ahci: Rename CONFIG_SATA_LPM_POLICY
configuration item back
On 4/7/22 01:59, Limonciello, Mario wrote:
> [Public]
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 21:11
>> To: Limonciello, Mario <Mario.Limonciello@....com>
>> Cc: open list:LIBATA SUBSYSTEM (Serial and Parallel ATA drivers) <linux-
>> ide@...r.kernel.org>; open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>;
>> hdegoede@...hat.com; Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ata: ahci: Rename CONFIG_SATA_LPM_POLICY
>> configuration item back
>>
>> On 4/5/22 05:02, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>>> CONFIG_SATA_LPM_MOBILE_POLICY was renamed to
>> CONFIG_SATA_LPM_POLICY in
>>> commit 4dd4d3deb502 ("ata: ahci: Rename
>> CONFIG_SATA_LPM_MOBILE_POLICY
>>> configuration item").
>>>
>>> This caused some pain as users would invisibly lose configuration policy
>>> defaults when they built the new kernel. To help alleviate that, switch
>>> back to the old name (even if it's wrong).
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
>>> Suggested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
>>
>> I applied this manually as the "default 3" is from the first patch,
>> which is for 5.19. This one is queued in for-5.18-fixes now. Thanks.
>
> Ah I didn't realize you were not going to put default 3 in 5.18, otherwise I would
> have re-ordered them. Sorry.
>
> Which branch did you push what you've applied so far to?
> I checked libata/for-next and libata/for-5.19 and didn't see anything yet.
I pushed the patch to for-5.18-fixes and will send a PR to Linus tomorrow.
The for-5.19 and for-next branches always are in sync and currently based
on 5.18-rc1. I will rebase them on rc2 next week to have the name revert
in and avoid conflicts.
>
> As most of my patches recently touch the same code want to me make sure
> any more follow ups work from the right base.
Use 5.19 + the name revert patch for your work. That will correspond to
for-5.19 next week.
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
Powered by blists - more mailing lists