[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <91ed3c18-6cff-c6d4-a628-81f1f71b21dc@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 09:57:22 -0500
From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: brijesh.singh@....com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Sergio Lopez <slp@...hat.com>, Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Dov Murik <dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com>,
Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum <tobin@....com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>,
brijesh.ksingh@...il.com, tony.luck@...el.com, marcorr@...gle.com,
sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 29/46] x86/boot: Add Confidential Computing type to
setup_data
On 4/6/22 16:19, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07 2022 at 15:33, Brijesh Singh wrote:
>>
>> +/*
>> + * AMD SEV Confidential computing blob structure. The structure is
>> + * defined in OVMF UEFI firmware header:
>> + * https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/OvmfPkg/Include/Guid/ConfidentialComputingSevSnpBlob.h
>> + */
>> +#define CC_BLOB_SEV_HDR_MAGIC 0x45444d41
>> +struct cc_blob_sev_info {
>> + u32 magic;
>> + u16 version;
>> + u16 reserved;
>> + u64 secrets_phys;
>> + u32 secrets_len;
>> + u32 rsvd1;
>> + u64 cpuid_phys;
>> + u32 cpuid_len;
>> + u32 rsvd2;
>> +};
>
> Shouldn't this be packed?
>
Yep, to avoid any additional compiler alignment we should pack it.
thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists