[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD5ugGDe1SnjEKfoJp0yS8BM-PPc=dOJ+7u-eEkMH0pSOTyFZg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 21:36:05 +0300
From: Григорий <h0tc0d3@...il.com>
To: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>
Cc: Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@...il.com>,
Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@....com>,
Melissa Wen <mwen@...lia.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Guchun Chen <guchun.chen@....com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
"Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
amd-gfx list <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Maling list - DRI developers
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Joseph Greathouse <Joseph.Greathouse@....com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Evan Quan <evan.quan@....com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Fix code with incorrect enum type
Alex Deucher I will do it. Initially, I came across an error that
different enum types are used.
Now I looked at the files, and indeed AMDGPU_GFX_PIPE_PRIO_* is used
instead of AMDGPU_RING_PRIO_*.
The question remains whether it is worth increasing the priority to
AMDGPU_RING_PRIO_MAX=3 ?
Regards, Grigory.
чт, 7 апр. 2022 г. в 20:46, Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>:
>
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 2:21 AM Christian König
> <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Am 06.04.22 um 18:50 schrieb Grigory Vasilyev:
> > > Instead of the 'amdgpu_ring_priority_level' type,
> > > the 'amdgpu_gfx_pipe_priority' type was used,
> > > which is an error when setting ring priority.
> > > This is a minor error, but may cause problems in the future.
> > >
> > > Instead of AMDGPU_RING_PRIO_2 = 2, we can use AMDGPU_RING_PRIO_MAX = 3,
> > > but AMDGPU_RING_PRIO_2 = 2 is used for compatibility with
> > > AMDGPU_GFX_PIPE_PRIO_HIGH = 2, and not change the behavior of the
> > > code.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Grigory Vasilyev <h0tc0d3@...il.com>
> >
> > Good catch, Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
> >
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c
> > > index 5554084ec1f1..9bc26395f833 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c
> > > @@ -1929,7 +1929,7 @@ static int gfx_v8_0_compute_ring_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev, int ring_id,
> > > + ring->pipe;
> > >
> > > hw_prio = amdgpu_gfx_is_high_priority_compute_queue(adev, ring) ?
> > > - AMDGPU_GFX_PIPE_PRIO_HIGH : AMDGPU_RING_PRIO_DEFAULT;
> > > + AMDGPU_RING_PRIO_2 : AMDGPU_RING_PRIO_DEFAULT;
>
> gfx_v8_0.c, gfx_v9_0.c, gfx_v10_0.c all do this. Care to fix them all up?
>
> Alex
>
> > > /* type-2 packets are deprecated on MEC, use type-3 instead */
> > > r = amdgpu_ring_init(adev, ring, 1024, &adev->gfx.eop_irq, irq_type,
> > > hw_prio, NULL);
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists