linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv8 00/30] TDX Guest: TDX core support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 7 Apr 2022 18:53:04 +0000
From:   Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To:     "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
        mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, luto@...nel.org,
        peterz@...radead.org, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com,
        aarcange@...hat.com, ak@...ux.intel.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
        david@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, jgross@...e.com,
        jmattson@...gle.com, joro@...tes.org, jpoimboe@...hat.com,
        knsathya@...nel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com, sdeep@...are.com,
        tony.luck@...el.com, vkuznets@...hat.com, wanpengli@...cent.com,
        thomas.lendacky@....com, brijesh.singh@....com, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv8 00/30] TDX Guest: TDX core support

On Thu, Apr 07, 2022, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 04:50:46PM +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 07, 2022, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > > It would also be really nice to get some SEV folks on the list as
> > > well.  I suspect the coco/ directory will grow more common SEV/TDX
> > > code over time.
> > > 
> > > X86 CONFIDENTIAL COMPUTING
> > > M:      x86@...nel.org
> > > R:	Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
> > > ...
> > > S:      Supported
> > > F:      arch/x86/coco/
> > > ...
> > 
> > And/or a dedicated vger list?
> 
> We already have linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev. Although, it is not
> x86-specific.

Is it ok to spam that list with TDX/SNP stuff, or would it be better to create
something x86-specific?