[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <04e7c9aa-da4f-55ba-f329-5ac236dd5a6b@bytedance.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2022 14:23:00 +0800
From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
To: Benjamin Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, duanxiongchun@...edance.com,
songmuchun@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: Fix cfs_rq_clock_pelt()
for throttled cfs_rq
On 2022/4/8 04:57, Benjamin Segall wrote:
> Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com> writes:
>
>> Since commit 23127296889f ("sched/fair: Update scale invariance of PELT")
>> change to use rq_clock_pelt() instead of rq_clock_task(), we should also
>> use rq_clock_pelt() for throttled_clock_task_time and throttled_clock_task
>> accounting.
>
> I think this patch is indeed what we want, despite the confusing
> interactions between pelt slowdown+skipping and throttle_clock_task
> trying to freeze time.
>
> I think it would be slightly better to rename
> throttled_clock_task(_time) to be clock_pelt rather than clock_task, but
> that's minor.
It's a good suggestion, will do and send v2.
Thanks.
>
> Reviewed-by: Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>
>
>>
>> Fixes: 23127296889f ("sched/fair: Update scale invariance of PELT")
>> Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/sched/fair.c | 6 +++---
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> index d4bd299d67ab..e6fa5d1141b4 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> @@ -4846,7 +4846,7 @@ static int tg_unthrottle_up(struct task_group *tg, void *data)
>>
>> cfs_rq->throttle_count--;
>> if (!cfs_rq->throttle_count) {
>> - cfs_rq->throttled_clock_task_time += rq_clock_task(rq) -
>> + cfs_rq->throttled_clock_task_time += rq_clock_pelt(rq) -
>> cfs_rq->throttled_clock_task;
>>
>> /* Add cfs_rq with load or one or more already running entities to the list */
>> @@ -4864,7 +4864,7 @@ static int tg_throttle_down(struct task_group *tg, void *data)
>>
>> /* group is entering throttled state, stop time */
>> if (!cfs_rq->throttle_count) {
>> - cfs_rq->throttled_clock_task = rq_clock_task(rq);
>> + cfs_rq->throttled_clock_task = rq_clock_pelt(rq);
>> list_del_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
>> }
>> cfs_rq->throttle_count++;
>> @@ -5308,7 +5308,7 @@ static void sync_throttle(struct task_group *tg, int cpu)
>> pcfs_rq = tg->parent->cfs_rq[cpu];
>>
>> cfs_rq->throttle_count = pcfs_rq->throttle_count;
>> - cfs_rq->throttled_clock_task = rq_clock_task(cpu_rq(cpu));
>> + cfs_rq->throttled_clock_task = rq_clock_pelt(cpu_rq(cpu));
>> }
>>
>> /* conditionally throttle active cfs_rq's from put_prev_entity() */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists