[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtAYR-G2X2RnCJKLqS6J-Kn-tZTp9JyzxR3j9jsFbmwZwA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2022 09:16:58 +0200
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To: Benjamin Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>
Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, mgorman@...e.de,
bristot@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
duanxiongchun@...edance.com, songmuchun@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: Delete useless condition in tg_unthrottle_up()
On Thu, 7 Apr 2022 at 23:00, Benjamin Segall <bsegall@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com> writes:
>
> > Fully decayed cfs_rq is impossible to have queued entities,
> > the first condition "!cfs_rq_is_decayed(cfs_rq)" is enough
> > to cover.
>
> In particular, cfs_rq->load.weight is part of cfs_rq_is_decayed.
Testing cfs_rq->load.weight is the key point because nothing prevent
to add a task with null load
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
>
> Reviewed-by: Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
> > ---
> > kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > index e6fa5d1141b4..17c13c38b1c2 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > @@ -4850,7 +4850,7 @@ static int tg_unthrottle_up(struct task_group *tg, void *data)
> > cfs_rq->throttled_clock_task;
> >
> > /* Add cfs_rq with load or one or more already running entities to the list */
> > - if (!cfs_rq_is_decayed(cfs_rq) || cfs_rq->nr_running)
> > + if (!cfs_rq_is_decayed(cfs_rq))
> > list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
> > }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists