[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YlAeU7TINRVD0t2W@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2022 13:36:51 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Sai Prakash Ranjan <quic_saipraka@...cinc.com>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv6] tty: hvc: dcc: Bind driver to CPU core0 for reads and
writes
On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 04:52:35PM +0530, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 3/10/2022 8:56 AM, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
> > From: Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@...eaurora.org>
> >
> > Some debuggers, such as Trace32 from Lauterbach GmbH, do not handle
> > reads/writes from/to DCC on secondary cores. Each core has its
> > own DCC device registers, so when a core reads or writes from/to DCC,
> > it only accesses its own DCC device. Since kernel code can run on
> > any core, every time the kernel wants to write to the console, it
> > might write to a different DCC.
> >
> > In SMP mode, Trace32 creates multiple windows, and each window shows
> > the DCC output only from that core's DCC. The result is that console
> > output is either lost or scattered across windows.
> >
> > Selecting this option will enable code that serializes all console
> > input and output to core 0. The DCC driver will create input and
> > output FIFOs that all cores will use. Reads and writes from/to DCC
> > are handled by a workqueue that runs only core 0.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@...eaurora.org>
> > Acked-by: Adam Wallis <awallis@...eaurora.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Elliot Berman <eberman@...eaurora.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <quic_saipraka@...cinc.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes in v6:
> > * Disable CPU hotplug when CONFIG_HVC_DCC_SERIALIZE_SMP=y.
> >
> > Changes in v5:
> > * Use get_cpu() and put_cpu() for CPU id check in preemptible context.
> > * Revert back to build time Kconfig.
> > * Remove unnecessary hotplug locks, they result in sleeping in atomic context bugs.
> > * Add a comment for the spinlock.
> >
> > Changes in v4:
> > * Use module parameter for runtime choice of enabling this feature.
> > * Use hotplug locks to avoid race between cpu online check and work schedule.
> > * Remove ifdefs and move to common ops.
> > * Remove unnecessary check for this configuration.
> > * Use macros for buf size instead of magic numbers.
> > * v3 - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211213141013.21464-1-quic_saipraka@quicinc.com/
> >
> > Changes in v3:
> > * Handle case where core0 is not online.
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > * Checkpatch warning fixes.
> > * Use of IS_ENABLED macros instead of ifdefs.
> >
> > ---
> > drivers/tty/hvc/Kconfig | 20 +++++
> > drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_dcc.c | 175 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 2 files changed, 192 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/tty/hvc/Kconfig b/drivers/tty/hvc/Kconfig
> > index 8d60e0ff67b4..62560cd0c04d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tty/hvc/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/tty/hvc/Kconfig
> > @@ -87,6 +87,26 @@ config HVC_DCC
> > driver. This console is used through a JTAG only on ARM. If you don't have
> > a JTAG then you probably don't want this option.
> > +config HVC_DCC_SERIALIZE_SMP
> > + bool "Use DCC only on CPU core 0"
> > + depends on SMP && HVC_DCC
> > + help
> > + Some debuggers, such as Trace32 from Lauterbach GmbH, do not handle
> > + reads/writes from/to DCC on more than one CPU core. Each core has its
> > + own DCC device registers, so when a CPU core reads or writes from/to
> > + DCC, it only accesses its own DCC device. Since kernel code can run on
> > + any CPU core, every time the kernel wants to write to the console, it
> > + might write to a different DCC.
> > +
> > + In SMP mode, Trace32 creates multiple windows, and each window shows
> > + the DCC output only from that core's DCC. The result is that console
> > + output is either lost or scattered across windows.
> > +
> > + Selecting this option will enable code that serializes all console
> > + input and output to CPU core 0. The DCC driver will create input and
> > + output FIFOs that all cores will use. Reads and writes from/to DCC
> > + are handled by a workqueue that runs only CPU core 0.
> > +
> > config HVC_RISCV_SBI
> > bool "RISC-V SBI console support"
> > depends on RISCV_SBI_V01
> > diff --git a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_dcc.c b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_dcc.c
> > index 8e0edb7d93fd..e87b82e873d7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_dcc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_dcc.c
> > @@ -2,9 +2,14 @@
> > /* Copyright (c) 2010, 2014 The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved. */
> > #include <linux/console.h>
> > +#include <linux/cpu.h>
> > +#include <linux/cpumask.h>
> > #include <linux/init.h>
> > +#include <linux/kfifo.h>
> > #include <linux/serial.h>
> > #include <linux/serial_core.h>
> > +#include <linux/smp.h>
> > +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
> > #include <asm/dcc.h>
> > #include <asm/processor.h>
> > @@ -15,6 +20,15 @@
> > #define DCC_STATUS_RX (1 << 30)
> > #define DCC_STATUS_TX (1 << 29)
> > +#define DCC_INBUF_SIZE 128
> > +#define DCC_OUTBUF_SIZE 1024
> > +
> > +/* Lock to serialize access to DCC fifo */
> > +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(dcc_lock);
> > +
> > +static DEFINE_KFIFO(inbuf, unsigned char, DCC_INBUF_SIZE);
> > +static DEFINE_KFIFO(outbuf, unsigned char, DCC_OUTBUF_SIZE);
> > +
> > static void dcc_uart_console_putchar(struct uart_port *port, int ch)
> > {
> > while (__dcc_getstatus() & DCC_STATUS_TX)
> > @@ -67,24 +81,176 @@ static int hvc_dcc_get_chars(uint32_t vt, char *buf, int count)
> > return i;
> > }
> > +/*
> > + * Check if the DCC is enabled. If CONFIG_HVC_DCC_SERIALIZE_SMP is enabled,
> > + * then we assume then this function will be called first on core0. That way,
> > + * dcc_core0_available will be true only if it's available on core0.
> > + */
> > static bool hvc_dcc_check(void)
> > {
> > unsigned long time = jiffies + (HZ / 10);
> > + static bool dcc_core0_available;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * If we're not on core 0, but we previously confirmed that DCC is
> > + * active, then just return true.
> > + */
> > + int cpu = get_cpu();
> > +
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HVC_DCC_SERIALIZE_SMP) && cpu && dcc_core0_available) {
> > + put_cpu();
> > + return true;
> > + }
> > +
> > + put_cpu();
> > /* Write a test character to check if it is handled */
> > __dcc_putchar('\n');
> > while (time_is_after_jiffies(time)) {
> > - if (!(__dcc_getstatus() & DCC_STATUS_TX))
> > + if (!(__dcc_getstatus() & DCC_STATUS_TX)) {
> > + dcc_core0_available = true;
> > return true;
> > + }
> > }
> > return false;
> > }
> > +/*
> > + * Workqueue function that writes the output FIFO to the DCC on core 0.
> > + */
> > +static void dcc_put_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > +{
> > + unsigned char ch;
> > + unsigned long irqflags;
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&dcc_lock, irqflags);
> > +
> > + /* While there's data in the output FIFO, write it to the DCC */
> > + while (kfifo_get(&outbuf, &ch))
> > + hvc_dcc_put_chars(0, &ch, 1);
> > +
> > + /* While we're at it, check for any input characters */
> > + while (!kfifo_is_full(&inbuf)) {
> > + if (!hvc_dcc_get_chars(0, &ch, 1))
> > + break;
> > + kfifo_put(&inbuf, ch);
> > + }
> > +
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dcc_lock, irqflags);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static DECLARE_WORK(dcc_pwork, dcc_put_work);
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Workqueue function that reads characters from DCC and puts them into the
> > + * input FIFO.
> > + */
> > +static void dcc_get_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > +{
> > + unsigned char ch;
> > + unsigned long irqflags;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Read characters from DCC and put them into the input FIFO, as
> > + * long as there is room and we have characters to read.
> > + */
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&dcc_lock, irqflags);
> > +
> > + while (!kfifo_is_full(&inbuf)) {
> > + if (!hvc_dcc_get_chars(0, &ch, 1))
> > + break;
> > + kfifo_put(&inbuf, ch);
> > + }
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dcc_lock, irqflags);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static DECLARE_WORK(dcc_gwork, dcc_get_work);
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Write characters directly to the DCC if we're on core 0 and the FIFO
> > + * is empty, or write them to the FIFO if we're not.
> > + */
> > +static int hvc_dcc0_put_chars(u32 vt, const char *buf, int count)
> > +{
> > + int len;
> > + unsigned long irqflags;
> > +
> > + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HVC_DCC_SERIALIZE_SMP))
> > + return hvc_dcc_put_chars(vt, buf, count);
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&dcc_lock, irqflags);
> > + if (smp_processor_id() || (!kfifo_is_empty(&outbuf))) {
> > + len = kfifo_in(&outbuf, buf, count);
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dcc_lock, irqflags);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * We just push data to the output FIFO, so schedule the
> > + * workqueue that will actually write that data to DCC.
> > + * CPU hotplug is disabled so CPU0 cannot be offlined
> > + * after the cpu online check.
> > + */
> > + if (cpu_online(0))
> > + schedule_work_on(0, &dcc_pwork);
> > +
> > + return len;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * If we're already on core 0, and the FIFO is empty, then just
> > + * write the data to DCC.
> > + */
> > + len = hvc_dcc_put_chars(vt, buf, count);
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dcc_lock, irqflags);
> > +
> > + return len;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Read characters directly from the DCC if we're on core 0 and the FIFO
> > + * is empty, or read them from the FIFO if we're not.
> > + */
> > +static int hvc_dcc0_get_chars(u32 vt, char *buf, int count)
> > +{
> > + int len;
> > + unsigned long irqflags;
> > +
> > + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HVC_DCC_SERIALIZE_SMP))
> > + return hvc_dcc_get_chars(vt, buf, count);
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&dcc_lock, irqflags);
> > +
> > + if (smp_processor_id() || (!kfifo_is_empty(&inbuf))) {
> > + len = kfifo_out(&inbuf, buf, count);
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dcc_lock, irqflags);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * If the FIFO was empty, there may be characters in the DCC
> > + * that we haven't read yet. Schedule a workqueue to fill
> > + * the input FIFO, so that the next time this function is
> > + * called, we'll have data. CPU hotplug is disabled so CPU0
> > + * cannot be offlined after the cpu online check.
> > + */
> > + if (!len && cpu_online(0))
> > + schedule_work_on(0, &dcc_gwork);
> > +
> > + return len;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * If we're already on core 0, and the FIFO is empty, then just
> > + * read the data from DCC.
> > + */
> > + len = hvc_dcc_get_chars(vt, buf, count);
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dcc_lock, irqflags);
> > +
> > + return len;
> > +}
> > +
> > static const struct hv_ops hvc_dcc_get_put_ops = {
> > - .get_chars = hvc_dcc_get_chars,
> > - .put_chars = hvc_dcc_put_chars,
> > + .get_chars = hvc_dcc0_get_chars,
> > + .put_chars = hvc_dcc0_put_chars,
> > };
> > static int __init hvc_dcc_console_init(void)
> > @@ -108,6 +274,9 @@ static int __init hvc_dcc_init(void)
> > if (!hvc_dcc_check())
> > return -ENODEV;
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HVC_DCC_SERIALIZE_SMP))
> > + cpu_hotplug_disable();
> > +
> > p = hvc_alloc(0, 0, &hvc_dcc_get_put_ops, 128);
> > return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(p);
> >
> > base-commit: 6705cd745adbbeac6b13002c7a30060f7b2568a5
>
> Gentle ping to take a look at this version.
It has been just a few days since the merge window closed.
And here is my to-review queue:
$ mdfrm -c ~/mail/todo/
2211 messages in /home/gregkh/mail/todo/
Please help out and review other patches that have been submitted on the
lists to help make this go faster for everyone involved.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists