[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <164941462755.3967238.7784714539452982763.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2022 14:58:45 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, guoren@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de
Cc: catalin.marinas@....com, kernel-team@...roid.com,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org,
Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>, linux-csky@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 0/4] arch: patch_text: Fixup last cpu should be master
On Thu, 7 Apr 2022 15:33:19 +0800, guoren@...nel.org wrote:
> From: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
>
> These patch_text implementations are using stop_machine_cpuslocked
> infrastructure with atomic cpu_count. The original idea: When the
> master CPU patch_text, the others should wait for it. But current
> implementation is using the first CPU as master, which couldn't
> guarantee the remaining CPUs are waiting. This patch changes the
> last CPU as the master to solve the potential risk.
>
> [...]
Applied first patch only to arm64 (for-next/fixes), thanks!
[1/4] arm64: patch_text: Fixup last cpu should be master
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/31a099dbd91e
Cheers,
--
Will
https://fixes.arm64.dev
https://next.arm64.dev
https://will.arm64.dev
Powered by blists - more mailing lists