[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220408135837.GE57095@chaop.bj.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2022 21:58:37 +0800
From: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, qemu-devel@...gnu.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
"J . Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
"Maciej S . Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@...gle.com>,
Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
luto@...nel.org, jun.nakajima@...el.com, dave.hansen@...el.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com, david@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/13] KVM: Use kvm_userspace_memory_region_ext
On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 10:26:55PM +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2022, Chao Peng wrote:
> > @@ -4476,14 +4477,23 @@ static long kvm_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp,
> > break;
> > }
> > case KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION: {
> > - struct kvm_userspace_memory_region kvm_userspace_mem;
> > + struct kvm_userspace_memory_region_ext region_ext;
>
> It's probably a good idea to zero initialize the full region to avoid consuming
> garbage stack data if there's a bug and an _ext field is accessed without first
> checking KVM_MEM_PRIVATE. I'm usually opposed to unnecessary initialization, but
> this seems like something we could screw up quite easily.
>
> > r = -EFAULT;
> > - if (copy_from_user(&kvm_userspace_mem, argp,
> > - sizeof(kvm_userspace_mem)))
> > + if (copy_from_user(®ion_ext, argp,
> > + sizeof(struct kvm_userspace_memory_region)))
> > goto out;
> > + if (region_ext.region.flags & KVM_MEM_PRIVATE) {
> > + int offset = offsetof(
> > + struct kvm_userspace_memory_region_ext,
> > + private_offset);
> > + if (copy_from_user(®ion_ext.private_offset,
> > + argp + offset,
> > + sizeof(region_ext) - offset))
>
> In this patch, KVM_MEM_PRIVATE should result in an -EINVAL as it's not yet
> supported. Copying the _ext on KVM_MEM_PRIVATE belongs in the "Expose KVM_MEM_PRIVATE"
> patch.
Agreed.
>
> Mechnically, what about first reading flags via get_user(), and then doing a single
> copy_from_user()? It's technically more work in the common case, and requires an
> extra check to guard against TOCTOU attacks, but this isn't a fast path by any means
> and IMO the end result makes it easier to understand the relationship between
> KVM_MEM_PRIVATE and the two different structs.
Will use this code, thanks for typing.
Chao
>
> E.g.
>
> case KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION: {
> struct kvm_user_mem_region region;
> unsigned long size;
> u32 flags;
>
> memset(®ion, 0, sizeof(region));
>
> r = -EFAULT;
> if (get_user(flags, (u32 __user *)(argp + offsetof(typeof(region), flags))))
> goto out;
>
> if (flags & KVM_MEM_PRIVATE)
> size = sizeof(struct kvm_userspace_memory_region_ext);
> else
> size = sizeof(struct kvm_userspace_memory_region);
> if (copy_from_user(®ion, argp, size))
> goto out;
>
> r = -EINVAL;
> if ((flags ^ region.flags) & KVM_MEM_PRIVATE)
> goto out;
>
> r = kvm_vm_ioctl_set_memory_region(kvm, ®ion);
> break;
> }
>
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> >
> > - r = kvm_vm_ioctl_set_memory_region(kvm, &kvm_userspace_mem);
> > + r = kvm_vm_ioctl_set_memory_region(kvm, ®ion_ext);
> > break;
> > }
> > case KVM_GET_DIRTY_LOG: {
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists